| Literature DB >> 26714172 |
Manfred Schartl1,2, Yingjia Shen3, Katja Maurus1, Ron Walter3, Chad Tomlinson4, Richard K Wilson4, John Postlethwait5, Wesley C Warren4.
Abstract
The incidence of malignant melanoma continues to increase each year with poor prognosis for survival in many relapse cases. To reverse this trend, whole body response measures are needed to discover collaborative paths to primary and secondary malignancy. Several species of fish provide excellent melanoma models because fish and human melanocytes both appear in the epidermis, and fish and human pigment cell tumors share conserved gene expression signatures. For the first time, we have examined the whole body transcriptome response to invasive melanoma as a prelude to using transcriptome profiling to screen for drugs in a medaka (Oryzias latipes) model. We generated RNA-seq data from whole body RNA isolates for controls and melanoma fish. After testing for differential expression, 396 genes had significantly different expression (adjusted p-value <0.02) in the whole body transcriptome between melanoma and control fish; 379 of these genes were matched to human orthologs with 233 having annotated human gene symbols and 14 matched genes that contain putative deleterious variants in human melanoma at varying levels of recurrence. A detailed canonical pathway evaluation for significant enrichment showed the top scoring pathway to be antigen presentation but also included the expected melanocyte development and pigmentation signaling pathway. Results revealed a profound down-regulation of genes involved in the immune response, especially the innate immune system. We hypothesize that the developing melanoma actively suppresses the immune system responses of the body in reacting to the invasive malignancy, and that this mal-adaptive response contributes to disease progression, a result that suggests our whole-body transcriptomic approach merits further use. In these findings, we also observed novel genes not yet identified in human melanoma expression studies and uncovered known and new candidate drug targets for further testing in this malignant melanoma medaka model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26714172 PMCID: PMC4699850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Transgenic medaka model for melanoma in juvenile fish (a) Control sibling and (b) fish with the mitf:xmrk transgene showing onset of malignant melanoma spreading over the fins and invading the body musculature at 3–4 weeks age (c) fish at 8 weeks of age with invasive and nodular melanoma. (d, e) Transverse sections through the posterior region of 4 weeks old mitf:xmrk transgenic medaka. (d) Melanoma invasion deep into the body trunk musculature. (e) Nest of melanoma cells (white arrowhead) close to the spinal cord. M muscle bundles, Sc scale, SpC spinal cord, black arrowheads point to stretches of invading melanoma cells, scale bars represent 50 μm in (d) and 20 μm in (e). (f) a nodular melanoma in an adult mitf:xmrk medaka.
The white arrowhead points to an area with lowly differentiated melanoma cells and a black arrowhead indicates a nest of heavily pigmented melanoma cells.
Fig 2Genes known to be associated with melanocyte development and pigmentation signaling.
Red and green colored gene symbols are increased or decreased, respectively, in melanoma fishes compared to control. The mitf gene (yellow) is upregulated but fails to reach statistical significance.
Estimated activation state for inferred melanoma gene network regulators.
| Upstream Regulator | Molecule Type | Predicted Activation State | Activation z-score | Medaka melanoma gene network count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-gamma | cytokine | Inhibited | -5.082 |
|
| TNF | cytokine | Inhibited | -3.173 | 24 |
| CD40LG | cytokine | Inhibited | -2.962 | 12 |
| LPS | chemical drug | Inhibited | -2.774 | 24 |
| IRF7 | transcription regulator | Inhibited | -2.63 | 7 |
| IL1B | cytokine | Inhibited | -2.626 | 17 |
| IL15 | cytokine | Inhibited | -2.583 | 11 |
| STAT1 | transcription regulator | Inhibited | -2.476 | 12 |
| LFNAR | group | Inhibited | -2.449 | 6 |
| IRF1 | transcription regulator | Inhibited | -2.361 | 9 |
| CD40 | transmembrane receptor | Inhibited | -2.356 | 6 |
| IL2 | cytokine | Inhibited | -2.253 | 12 |
| Aldesleukin | biologic drug | Inhibited | -2.219 | 5 |
| RELA | transcription regulator | Inhibited | -2.13 | 15 |
| IFN-alpha | group | Inhibited | -2.095 | 8 |
| Cisplatin | chemical drug | Inhibited | -2.064 | 10 |
| Inosine | chemical | Inhibited | -2 | 4 |
| Alefacept | biologic drug | Activated | 2 | 4 |
| OTX2 | transcription regulator | Activated | 2 | 4 |
| CDKN2A | transcription regulator | Activated | 2 | 5 |
| SB203580 | chemical—kinase inhibitor | Activated | 2.144 | 6 |
| LNS1 | other | Activated | 2.172 | 5 |
| PRDM1 | transcription regulator | Activated | 2.183 | 5 |
| Mibolerone | chemical drug | Activated | 2.2 | 5 |
| PPARG | ligand-dependent nuclear receptor | Activated | 2.213 | 5 |
| MAPK1 | kinase | Activated | 2.219 | 6 |
| APOE | transporter | Activated | 2.226 | 7 |
| Forskolin | chemical toxicant | Activated | 2.236 | 15 |
| Akt | group | Activated | 2.236 | 5 |
| RICTOR | other | Activated | 2.236 | 5 |
| CD3 | complex | Activated | 2.447 | 15 |
| PPARA | ligand-dependent nuclear receptor | Activated | 2.651 | 12 |
| IL10 | cytokine | Activated | 2.751 | 9 |
Fig 3Number of unique drugs predicted to target each known medaka melanoma differentially expressed gene.
The drug list is presented in full in S3 File.