Literature DB >> 26713968

Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma.

Kenji Inaba1, Hande Aksoy, Mark J Seamon, Joshua A Marks, Juan Duchesne, Rebecca Schroll, Charles J Fox, Fredric M Pieracci, Ernest E Moore, Bellal Joseph, Ansab A Haider, John A Harvin, Ryan A Lawless, Jeremy Cannon, Seth R Holland, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The indications and outcomes associated with temporary intravascular shunting (TIVS) for vascular trauma in the civilian sector are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to perform a contemporary multicenter review of TIVS use and outcomes.
METHODS: Patients sustaining vascular trauma, requiring TIVS insertion (January 2005 to December 2013), were retrospectively identified at seven Level I trauma centers. Clinical demographics, operative details, and outcomes were abstracted.
RESULTS: A total of 213 injuries (2.7%; 94.8% arterial) requiring TIVS were identified in 7,385 patients with vascular injuries. Median age was 27.0 years (range, 4-89 years), 91.0% were male, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15.0 (interquartile range, 4.0), Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.0 (interquartile range, 15.0), 26.0% had an ISS of 25 or greater, and 71.1% had penetrating injuries. The most common mechanism was gunshot wound (62.7%), followed by auto versus pedestrian (11.4%) and motor vehicle collision (6.5%). Shunts were placed for damage control in 63.4%, staged repair for combined orthopedic and vascular injuries in 36.1%, and for insufficient surgeon skill set in 0.5%. The most common vessel shunted was the superficial femoral artery (23.9%), followed by popliteal artery (18.8%) and brachial artery (13.2%). An argyle shunt (81.2%) was the most common conduit, followed by Pruitt-Inahara (9.4%). Dwell time was less than 6 hours in 61.4%, 24 hours in 86.5%, 48 hours in 95.9%, with only 4.1% remaining in place for more than 48 hours. Of the patients, 81.6% survived to definitive repair, and 79.6% survived overall. Complications included shunt thrombosis (5.6%) and dislodgment (1.4%). There was no association between dwell time and shunt thrombosis. The use of a noncommercial shunt (chest tube/feeding tube) did not impact shunt thrombosis but was an independent risk factor for subsequent graft failure. The limb salvage rate was 96.3%. No deaths could be attributed to a shunt complication.
CONCLUSION: In the largest civilian TIVS experience insertion to date, both damage control and staged orthopedic vascular injuries were common indications for shunting. With an acceptable complication burden and no associated mortality attributed to this technique, shunting should be considered a viable treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26713968     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  19 in total

1.  [Update on gunshot wounds to extremities].

Authors:  F von Lübken; G Achatz; B Friemert; M Mauser; A Franke; E Kollig; D Bieler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  A swine model of reproducible timed induction of peripheral arterial shunt failure: Developing warning signs of imminent shunt failure.

Authors:  David P Stonko; Neerav Patel; Joseph Edwards; Hossam Abdou; Eric Lang; Noha N Elansary; Rebecca Treffalls; Joseph White; Jonathan J Morrison
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Vascular trauma: Does experience in the United States apply to a Canadian centre?

Authors:  Shane Smith; Vivian McAlister; Neil Parry; Adam Power; Kelly Vogt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  [Vascular injury-An underestimated entity?]

Authors:  Thomas Jerkku; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Ramin Banafsche
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  Vascular Shunts in Civilian Trauma.

Authors:  Adham N Abou Ali; Karim M Salem; Louis H Alarcon; Graciela Bauza; Emmanuel Pikoulis; Rabih A Chaer; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-07-20

6.  Potential benefits of an integrated military/civilian trauma system: experiences from two major regional conflicts.

Authors:  Jeffry L Kashuk; Kobi Peleg; Elon Glassberg; Adi Givon; Irina Radomislensky; Yoram Kluger
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Superficial femoral artery transection following penetrating trauma.

Authors:  Rahil Dharia; Vinu Perinjelil; Rohit Nallani; Fadi Al Daoud; Gul Sachwani-Daswani; Leo Mercer; Kristoffer Wong
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-23

8.  [Application of a new temporary intravascular shunt device in limb injury of dogs].

Authors:  Changmeng Shan; Yongqing Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-15

9.  Damage control for subclavian artery injury.

Authors:  Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes; Mariana Pereira Maurity; Carlos Alberto Costa do Amaral
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2020-09-14

Review 10.  Pitfalls in the management of peripheral vascular injuries.

Authors:  David V Feliciano
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2017-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.