| Literature DB >> 26713621 |
YueHan Lu1, Xiaping Li1, Rajaa Mesfioui2, James E Bauer3, R M Chambers4, Elizabeth A Canuel5, Patrick G Hatcher2.
Abstract
Electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI-FTICR-MS) has proven to be a powerful technique revealing complexity and diversity of naturalEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26713621 PMCID: PMC4694922 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map showing the study region and our sampling sites.
Sampling streams are indicated by heavy black lines, and samples sites are indicated by solid black circles. Other streams in this area are denoted by gray lines, and the light blues lines are 12-digit HUC watershed boundaries.
Watershed land use, environmental parameters, and water parameters measured for the streams sampled in this study*.
| Sampling site | Watershed land use composition | Water temperature (°C) | Specific conductivity (μS) | pH | Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | DOC concentration (μM) | Water column chlorophyll-a (μg/L) | Nitrate (mg/L) | Ammonium (mg/L) | Sulfate (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 100% forest | 12.6 | 158.9 | 5 | 3.0 | 539 | 0.01 | b.d. | b.d. | 37.9 |
| F2 | 100% forest | 12.6 | 56.9 | 5 | 7.8 | 562 | 0.05 | b.d. | b.d. | 8.8 |
| P1 | 70% pasture, 30% forest | 12.6 | 210.4 | 6–7 | 7.9 | 675 | 0.14 | 2.29 | 2.49 | 14.4 |
| P2 | 61% pasture, 39% forest | 16.5 | 73.4 | 5 | 5.8 | 206 | 0.48 | b.d. | b.d. | 1.1 |
*b.d. = below detection; nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate were measured by using a Dionex ion chromatography.
Fig 2Van Krevelen diagrams of DOM at T0.
The light green solid line denotes the regression line through the minimum H/C and O/C values for formulas with AImod = 0.5 (i.e., the majority of aromatic molecules are plotted below the line) and the black solid line denotes the regression line for formulas with AImod = 0.67 (i.e., the majority of CAS molecules are below the line).
FTICR-MS parameters of the forest and pasture stream DOM samples at T0 and T15.
| Sample and Incubation Type | Time Point | Degradable DOC (%) | #peaks detected | #peaks with assigned formulas | Formulas in the CAS region | AImod between 0.5 and 0.67 | AImod >0.67 | (DBE) | (O/C) | (H/C) | Refractory formulas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 Bacteria-only | T0 | 13.2 | 4357 | 3083 | 206 (6.7%) | 767 (24.9%) | 146 (4.7%) | 11.01 | 0.30 | 1.17 | 85.7% |
| T15 | 4313 | 3063 | 201 (6.6%) | 616 (20.1%) | 140 (4.6%) | 11.17 | 0.30 | 1.17 | |||
| F2 Bacteria-only | T0 | 15.0 | 3704 | 2576 | 251 (9.7%) | 686 (26.6%) | 149 (5.78%) | 11.65 | 0.31 | 1.13 | 79.0% |
| T15 | 3681 | 2576 | 208 (8.1%) | 463 (18.0%) | 122 (4.74%) | 10.94 | 0.34 | 1.14 | |||
| P1 Bacteria-only | T0 | 1.9 | 3878 | 2502 | 22 (0.9%) | 291 (11.6%) | 15 (0.60%) | 9.74 | 0.26 | 1.30 | 32.0% |
| T15 | 1978 | 1386 | 5 (0.4%) | 36 (2.60%) | 6 (0.43%) | 8.40 | 0.37 | 1.34 | |||
| P2 Bacteria-only | T0 | 23.9 | 2746 | 1936 | 11 (0.6%) | 146 (7.54%) | 6 (0.31%) | 8.79 | 0.31 | 1.34 | 69.7% |
| T15 | 3403 | 2449 | 110 (4.5%) | 339 (13.8%) | 43 (1.76%) | 9.91 | 0.34 | 1.23 | |||
| P1 Light + Bacteria | T0 | 15.9 | 3878 | 2502 | 22 (0.9%) | 291 (11.6%) | 15 (0.60%) | 9.74 | 0.26 | 1.30 | 26.9% |
| T15 | 1007 | 692 | 0 (0%) | 5 (0.72%) | 0 (0%) | 7.61 | 0.30 | 1.39 | |||
| P2 Light + Bacteria | T0 | 50.0 | 2746 | 1936 | 11 (0.6%) | 146 (7.54%) | 6 (0.31%) | 8.79 | 0.32 | 1.34 | 63.1% |
| T15 | 2999 | 1916 | 0 (0%) | 36 (1.88%) | 0 (0%) | 8.54 | 0.37 | 1.35 |
* data from [3]
$ m/z in the range of 200–700; s/n ≥ 4; ratios (O/C), (H/C), and DBE were mean values from all peaks with assigned molecular formulas.
Fig 3Van Krevelen diagrams for molecular series in F1 and P1 at T0.
The light green solid line denotes the regression line through the minimum H/C and O/C values for formulas with AImod = 0.5 (i.e., the majority of aromatic molecules are plotted below the line) and the black solid line denotes the regression line for formulas with AImod = 0.67 (i.e., the majority of CAS molecules are below the line).
Fig 4a) Jaccard similarity coefficients of DOM formulas between different samples or incubation time points; b) Relative abundance (%total formulas) of aromatic formulas in T0 samples.
Fig 5Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot based on Bray-Curtis distances among the samples.
Fig 6Van Krevelen diagrams of refractory compounds a) ubiquitous for all samples in bacteria-only incubations; b) unique in F1 bacteria-only incubation; c) unique in F2 bacteria-only incubation; d) unique in P1 bacteria-only incubation; e) unique in P1 bacteria-only incubation; and f) ubiquitous for all samples in combined bacteria+light incubations.
The light green solid line denotes the regression line through the minimum H/C and O/C values for formulas with AImod = 0.5 (i.e., the majority of aromatic molecules are plotted below the line) and the black solid line denotes the regression line for formulas with AImod = 0.67 (i.e., the majority of CAS molecules are below the line).
Fig 7Correlations between Jaccard similarity coefficients and absolute changes in the proportions of the five Krevelen classified groups in the bacteria-only incubations.
Solid lines represent linear trend lines.
Fig 8Comparing DOM diversity prior to versus after the incubations through a) compound number, and b) DOM formula similarities indicated by Jaccard similarity coefficients between T0 vs. T15 samples.