Aristotle N Voineskos1, Daniel Felsky2, Anne L Wheeler3, David J Rotenberg4, Melissa Levesque4, Sejal Patel3, Philip R Szeszko5, James L Kennedy3, Todd Lencz5, Anil K Malhotra5. 1. Campbell Family Mental Health Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; These authors contributed equally to the article. Aristotle.Voineskos@camh.ca. 2. Campbell Family Mental Health Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; These authors contributed equally to the article. 3. Campbell Family Mental Health Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4. Campbell Family Mental Health Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 5. Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute, Manhasset, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are now over 100 established genetic risk variants for schizophrenia; however, their influence on brain structure and circuitry across the human lifespan are not known. METHODS: We examined healthy individuals 8-86 years of age, from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, the Zucker Hillside Hospital, and the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Following thorough quality control procedures, we investigated associations of established genetic risk variants with heritable neuroimaging phenotypes relevant to schizophrenia, namely thickness of frontal and temporal cortical regions (n = 565) and frontotemporal and interhemispheric white matter tract fractional anisotropy (FA) (n = 530). RESULTS: There was little evidence for association of risk variants with imaging phenotypes. No association with cortical thickness of any region was present. Only rs12148337, near a long noncoding RNA region, was associated with white matter FA (splenium of corpus callosum) following multiple comparison correction (corrected p = .012); this single nucleotide polymorphism was also associated with genu FA and superior longitudinal fasciculus FA at p <.005 (uncorrected). There was no association of polygenic risk score with white matter FA or cortical thickness. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, our findings provide limited evidence for association of schizophrenia risk variants with cortical thickness or diffusion imaging white matter phenotypes. When taken with recent lack of association of these variants with subcortical brain volumes, our results either suggest that structural neuroimaging approaches at current resolution are not sufficiently sensitive to detect effects of these risk variants or that multiple comparison correction in correlated phenotypes is too stringent, potentially "eliminating" biologically important signals.
BACKGROUND: There are now over 100 established genetic risk variants for schizophrenia; however, their influence on brain structure and circuitry across the human lifespan are not known. METHODS: We examined healthy individuals 8-86 years of age, from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, the Zucker Hillside Hospital, and the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Following thorough quality control procedures, we investigated associations of established genetic risk variants with heritable neuroimaging phenotypes relevant to schizophrenia, namely thickness of frontal and temporal cortical regions (n = 565) and frontotemporal and interhemispheric white matter tract fractional anisotropy (FA) (n = 530). RESULTS: There was little evidence for association of risk variants with imaging phenotypes. No association with cortical thickness of any region was present. Only rs12148337, near a long noncoding RNA region, was associated with white matter FA (splenium of corpus callosum) following multiple comparison correction (corrected p = .012); this single nucleotide polymorphism was also associated with genu FA and superior longitudinal fasciculus FA at p <.005 (uncorrected). There was no association of polygenic risk score with white matter FA or cortical thickness. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, our findings provide limited evidence for association of schizophrenia risk variants with cortical thickness or diffusion imaging white matter phenotypes. When taken with recent lack of association of these variants with subcortical brain volumes, our results either suggest that structural neuroimaging approaches at current resolution are not sufficiently sensitive to detect effects of these risk variants or that multiple comparison correction in correlated phenotypes is too stringent, potentially "eliminating" biologically important signals.
Authors: Shivani Patel; Katie Mahon; Robin Wellington; Jianping Zhang; William Chaplin; Philip R Szeszko Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M Kubicki; M Styner; S Bouix; G Gerig; D Markant; K Smith; R Kikinis; R W McCarley; M E Shenton Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Aristotle N Voineskos; Lauren J O'Donnell; Nancy J Lobaugh; Doug Markant; Stephanie H Ameis; Marc Niethammer; Benoit H Mulsant; Bruce G Pollock; James L Kennedy; Carl Fredrik Westin; Martha E Shenton Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jamie Yu Jin Thong; Anqi Qiu; Min Yi Sum; Carissa Nadia Kuswanto; Ta Ahn Tuan; Gary Donohoe; Yih Yian Sitoh; Kang Sim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Papiol; M Mitjans; F Assogna; F Piras; C Hammer; C Caltagirone; B Arias; H Ehrenreich; G Spalletta Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; Anya Savransky; Feven Fisseha; Krista Wisner; Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; L Elliot Hong Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Anne L Wheeler; Daniel Felsky; Joseph D Viviano; Sonja Stojanovski; Stephanie H Ameis; Peter Szatmari; Jason P Lerch; M Mallar Chakravarty; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: P H Lee; J T Baker; A J Holmes; N Jahanshad; T Ge; J-Y Jung; Y Cruz; D S Manoach; D P Hibar; J Faskowitz; K L McMahon; G I de Zubicaray; N G Martin; M J Wright; D Öngür; R Buckner; J Roffman; P M Thompson; J W Smoller Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Susan S Kuo; David R Roalf; Konasale M Prasad; Christie W Musket; Petra E Rupert; Joel Wood; Ruben C Gur; Laura Almasy; Raquel E Gur; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Michael F Pogue-Geile Journal: J Psychopathol Clin Sci Date: 2022-06-23