Literature DB >> 26712562

Sex, Mitochondria, and Genetic Rescue.

Justin C Havird1, Sarah W Fitzpatrick2, John Kronenberger3, W Chris Funk3, Lisa M Angeloni3, Daniel B Sloan3.   

Abstract

Genetic rescue is a potentially effective management tool to offset the effects of reduced genetic diversity in imperiled populations. However, implementation requires complex choices. Here we address the consequences of introducing males versus females, highlighting the possibility that introduced females might lead to maladapted mitonuclear genomes and reduced offspring fitness.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26712562      PMCID： PMC4724449          DOI： 10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN： 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  10 in total

1.  Mitochondrial mutations may decrease population viability.

Authors:  N J. Gemmell; F W. Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Genetic restoration of the Florida panther.

Authors:  Warren E Johnson; David P Onorato; Melody E Roelke; E Darrell Land; Mark Cunningham; Robert C Belden; Roy McBride; Deborah Jansen; Mark Lotz; David Shindle; JoGayle Howard; David E Wildt; Linda M Penfold; Jeffrey A Hostetler; Madan K Oli; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue.

Authors:  David A Tallmon; Gordon Luikart; Robin S Waples
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Medicine. Mitochondrial replacement, evolution, and the clinic.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt; Damian K Dowling; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression.

Authors:  Richard Frankham; Jonathan D Ballou; Mark D B Eldridge; Robert C Lacy; Katherine Ralls; Michele R Dudash; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Genetic rescue: a safe or risky bet?

Authors:  Donald M Waller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  Genetic rescue to the rescue.

Authors:  Andrew R Whiteley; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; W Chris Funk; David A Tallmon
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow.

Authors:  Richard Frankham
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Mother's curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability.

Authors:  Neil J Gemmell; Victoria J Metcalf; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A battle for transmission: the cooperative and selfish animal mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Anna Klucnika; Hansong Ma
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.411

2.  Disentangling the intertwined roles of mutation, selection and drift in the mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Sarah Schaack; Eddie K H Ho; Fenner Macrae
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.