Literature DB >> 26711888

Functional evolution of jumping in frogs: Interspecific differences in take-off and landing.

Stephen M Reilly1, Stephane J Montuelle2, André Schmidt2,3, Cornelia Krause2, Emily Naylor2,4, Richard L Essner5.   

Abstract

Ancestral frogs underwent anatomical shifts including elongation of the hindlimbs and pelvis and reduction of the tail and vertebral column that heralded the transition to jumping as a primary mode of locomotion. Jumping has been hypothesized to have evolved in a step-wise fashion with basal frogs taking-off with synchronous hindlimb extension and crash-landing on their bodies, and then their limbs move forward. Subsequently, frogs began to recycle the forelimbs forward earlier in the jump to control landing. Frogs with forelimb landing radiated into many forms, locomotor modes, habitats, and niches with controlled landing thought to improve escape behavior. While the biology of take-off behavior has seen considerable study, interspecific comparisons of take-off and landing behavior are limited. In order to understand the evolution of jumping and controlled landing in frogs, data are needed on the movements of the limbs and body across an array of taxa. Here, we present the first description and comparison of kinematics of the hindlimbs, forelimbs and body during take-off and landing in relation to ground reaction forces in four frog species spanning the frog phylogeny. The goal of this study is to understand what interspecific differences reveal about the evolution of take-off and controlled landing in frogs. We provide the first comparative description of the entire process of jumping in frogs. Statistical comparisons identify both homologous behaviors and significant differences among species that are used to map patterns of trait evolution and generate hypotheses regarding the functional evolution of take-off and landing in frogs.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  Ascaphus; Bombina; Lithobates; Rhinella; anurans; forces; locomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711888     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  5 in total

1.  Semicircular canal size constrains vestibular function in miniaturized frogs.

Authors:  Richard L Essner; Rudá E E Pereira; David C Blackburn; Amber L Singh; Edward L Stanley; Mauricio O Moura; André E Confetti; Marcio R Pie
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 14.957

2.  Evidence toads may modulate landing preparation without predicting impact time.

Authors:  S M Cox; Gary Gillis
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.422

3.  Diversity and function of the fused anuran radioulna.

Authors:  Rachel Keeffe; David C Blackburn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.921

4.  Cooperation behavior of fore- And hindlimbs during jumping in Rana dybowskii and Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Mo Li; Zibo Gao; Jili Wang; Wei Song; Qingzhu Zhang; Jin Tong; Lili Ren
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The dynamic role of the ilio-sacral joint in jumping frogs.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Enrico A Eberhard; Amber J Collings
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.