Literature DB >> 26711717

Reproducible research in statistics: A review and guidelines for the Biometrical Journal.

Benjamin Hofner1, Matthias Schmid2, Lutz Edler3.   

Abstract

Reproducible research (RR) constitutes the idea that a publication should be accompanied by all relevant material to reproduce the results and findings of a scientific work. Hence, results can be verified and researchers are able to build upon these. Efforts of the Biometrical Journal over the last five years have increased the number of manuscripts which are reproducible by a factor of 4 to almost 50%. Yet, more than half of the code submission could not be executed in the initial review due to missing code, missing data or errors in the code. Careful checks of the submitted code as part of the reviewing process are essential to eliminate these issues and to foster RR. In this article, we reviewed n=56 recent submissions of code and data to identify common reproducibility issues. Based on these findings, guidelines for structuring code submission to the Biometrical Journal have been established to help authors. These guidelines should help researchers to implement RR in general. Together with the code reviews, this supports the mission of the Biometrical Journal in publishing highest quality, novel and relevant papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences. Source code and data to reproduce the presented data analyses are available as Supplementary Material on the journal's web page.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  Biometrical Journal; Guideline; Reproducible research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711717     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201500156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  6 in total

Review 1.  Statistical Guidance for Reviewers of Toxicologic Pathology.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Statistical Contributions to Bioinformatics: Design, Modeling, Structure Learning, and Integration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.039

3.  Dissemination of novel biostatistics methods: Impact of programming code availability and other characteristics on article citations.

Authors:  Amy E Wahlquist; Lutfiyya N Muhammad; Teri Lynn Herbert; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking.

Authors:  Lukas M Weber; Wouter Saelens; Robrecht Cannoodt; Charlotte Soneson; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Paul P Gardner; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Yvan Saeys; Mark D Robinson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Validating the knowledge bank approach for personalized prediction of survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Yujun Xu; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 5.881

6.  Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.

Authors:  Amy Price; Sara Schroter; Mike Clarke; Helen McAneney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.