Nerea Sevilla1, Albert Clara2, Carles Diaz-Duran1, Carlos Ruiz-Carmona1, Sara Ibañez1. 1. Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 080003, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 080003, Barcelona, Spain. aclara@hospitaldelmar.cat.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a prophylactic procedure, so the decision to operate should consider, as recent guidelines suggest, the life expectancy of the patient. Several models for predicting life span have been already designed, but little is known about how intervened patients evolve in Southern European Countries, where the incidence of coronary artery disease, the main cause of death among these subjects, is low. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 176 consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR at the Vascular Surgery Department of the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain) during 2000-2014. Cox regressions were performed to identify preoperative factors associated with long-term survival after EVAR, and a risk model was developed. RESULTS: Three- and five-year survival rates were 73.9 and 53.9 %, respectively. During the follow-up, 72 deaths (40.9 %) were registered, cancer being the most frequent cause (41.7 %). Preoperative variables negatively associated with long-term survival were serum creatinine ≥ 150 µmol/L (HR 2.5; 95 % CI 1.4-4.2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1), atrial fibrillation (HR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2-3.4), and prior cancer history (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1). Distal pulses present in both lower limbs were marginally associated with survival (HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.4-1.07). The survival predictive model showed a good discrimination capacity (C statistic = 0.703; 95 % CI 0.641-0.765). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of patients submitted to EVAR in our setting was worse than expected and markedly related to cancer. Our study suggests that predictive models for long-term survival after EVAR may be influenced by regional characteristics of the intervened population. This effect should be taken in consideration in the decision-making process of these patients.
BACKGROUND:Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a prophylactic procedure, so the decision to operate should consider, as recent guidelines suggest, the life expectancy of the patient. Several models for predicting life span have been already designed, but little is known about how intervened patients evolve in Southern European Countries, where the incidence of coronary artery disease, the main cause of death among these subjects, is low. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 176 consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR at the Vascular Surgery Department of the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain) during 2000-2014. Cox regressions were performed to identify preoperative factors associated with long-term survival after EVAR, and a risk model was developed. RESULTS: Three- and five-year survival rates were 73.9 and 53.9 %, respectively. During the follow-up, 72 deaths (40.9 %) were registered, cancer being the most frequent cause (41.7 %). Preoperative variables negatively associated with long-term survival were serum creatinine ≥ 150 µmol/L (HR 2.5; 95 % CI 1.4-4.2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1), atrial fibrillation (HR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2-3.4), and prior cancer history (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1). Distal pulses present in both lower limbs were marginally associated with survival (HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.4-1.07). The survival predictive model showed a good discrimination capacity (C statistic = 0.703; 95 % CI 0.641-0.765). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of patients submitted to EVAR in our setting was worse than expected and markedly related to cancer. Our study suggests that predictive models for long-term survival after EVAR may be influenced by regional characteristics of the intervened population. This effect should be taken in consideration in the decision-making process of these patients.
Authors: F L Moll; J T Powell; G Fraedrich; F Verzini; S Haulon; M Waltham; J A van Herwaarden; P J E Holt; J W van Keulen; B Rantner; F J V Schlösser; F Setacci; J-B Ricco Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: David C Brewster; John E Jones; Thomas K Chung; Glenn M Lamuraglia; Christopher J Kwolek; Michael T Watkins; Thomas M Hodgman; Richard P Cambria Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Derek P Nathan; Clayton J Brinster; Benjamin M Jackson; Grace J Wang; Jeffrey P Carpenter; Ronald M Fairman; Edward Y Woo Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Brendan Wisniowski; Mary Barnes; Jason Jenkins; Nicholas Boyne; Allan Kruger; Philip J Walker Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Stefan Lange; Hans Joachim Trampisch; Roman Haberl; Harald Darius; David Pittrow; Alexander Schuster; Berndt von Stritzky; Gerhart Tepohl; Jens Rainer Allenberg; Curt Diehm Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: John Rose; Christopher Evans; Andrew Barleben; Dennis Bandyk; S Eric Wilson; David C Chang; John Lane Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Frank A Lederle; Julie A Freischlag; Tassos C Kyriakides; Jon S Matsumura; Frank T Padberg; Ted R Kohler; Panagiotis Kougias; Jessie M Jean-Claude; Dolores F Cikrit; Kathleen M Swanson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dustin M Thomas; Edward A Hulten; Shane T Ellis; David M F Anderson; Nathan Anderson; Fiora McRae; Jamil A Malik; Todd C Villines; Ahmad M Slim Journal: ISRN Cardiol Date: 2014-04-02
Authors: Randall R DeMartino; Ying Huang; Jay Mandrekar; Philip P Goodney; Gustavo S Oderich; Manju Kalra; Thomas C Bower; Jack L Cronenwett; Peter Gloviczki Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 4.268