Literature DB >> 26711303

Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia.

Hayley E Pearson1, Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio2, Steven J Lapidge3, Marta Hernández-Jover4.   

Abstract

Wild animals contribute to endemic infection in livestock as well as the introduction, reintroduction and maintenance of pathogens. The source of introduction of endemic diseases to a piggery is often unknown and the extent of wildlife contribution to such local spread is largely unexplored. The aim of the current study was to quantitatively assess the probability of domestic pigs being exposed to different pathogens from wild animals commonly found around commercial piggeries in Australia. Specifically, this study aims to quantify the probability of exposure to the pathogens Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. from European starlings (Sturnus vulgarus); Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, Lawsonia intracellularis and Salmonella spp. from rats (Rattus rattus and Rattus norvegicus); and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Leptospira spp., Brucella suis and L. intracellularis from feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Exposure assessments, using scenario trees and Monte Carlo stochastic simulation modelling, were conducted to identify potential pathways of introduction and calculate the probabilities of these pathways occurring. Input parameters were estimated from a national postal survey of commercial pork producers and from disease detection studies conducted for European starlings, rats and feral pigs in close proximity to commercial piggeries in Australia. Based on the results of the exposure assessments, rats presented the highest probability of exposure of pathogens to domestic pigs at any point in time, and L. intracellularis (median 0.13, 5% and 95%, 0.05-0.23) and B. hyodysenteriae (median 0.10, 0.05-0.19) were the most likely pathogens to be transmitted. Regarding European starlings, the median probability of exposure of domestic pigs to pathogenic E. coli at any point in time was estimated to be 0.03 (0.02-0.04). The highest probability of domestic pig exposure to feral pig pathogens at any point in time was found to be for M. hyopneumoniae (median 0.013, 0.007-0.022) and L. intracellularis (median 0.006, 0.003-0.011) for pigs in free-range piggeries. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the presence and number of wild animals around piggeries, their access to piggeries and pig food and water, and, in the case of feral pigs, their proximity to piggeries, are the most influential parameters on the probability of exposure. Findings from this study support identification of mitigation strategies that could be implemented at on-farm and industry level to minimize the exposure risk from European starlings, rats and feral pigs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European starling; Exposure; Feral pig; Livestock; Pathogen; Rat

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711303     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  8 in total

1.  Identification of high-risk contact areas between feral pigs and outdoor-raised pig operations in California: Implications for disease transmission in the wildlife-livestock interface.

Authors:  Laura Patterson; Jaber Belkhiria; Beatriz Martínez-López; Alda F A Pires
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Dispersal and Land Cover Contribute to Pseudorabies Virus Exposure in Invasive Wild Pigs.

Authors:  Felipe A Hernández; Amanda N Carr; Michael P Milleson; Hunter R Merrill; Michael L Avery; Brandon M Parker; Cortney L Pylant; James D Austin; Samantha M Wisely
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Lawsonia intracellularis in the feces of wild rodents and stray cats captured around equine farms.

Authors:  Jeong-Min Hwang; Myung-Ji Seo; Jung-Yong Yeh
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Quantifying drivers of wild pig movement across multiple spatial and temporal scales.

Authors:  Shannon L Kay; Justin W Fischer; Andrew J Monaghan; James C Beasley; Raoul Boughton; Tyler A Campbell; Susan M Cooper; Stephen S Ditchkoff; Steve B Hartley; John C Kilgo; Samantha M Wisely; A Christy Wyckoff; Kurt C VerCauteren; Kim M Pepin
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.600

Review 5.  Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.

Authors:  Laura Valeria Alarcón; Alberto Allepuz; Enric Mateu
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 6.  European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) as Vectors and Reservoirs of Pathogens Affecting Humans and Domestic Livestock.

Authors:  Paul R Cabe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Ståhl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Francesca Baldinelli; Alessandro Broglia; Lisa Kohnle; Yves Van der Stede; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-03-15

8.  Start-up financing of professional pest control in pig farming in North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany.

Authors:  Odile C Hecker; Marc Boelhauve; Marcus Mergenthaler
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.