Literature DB >> 26711102

Rectocele repair with stapled transvaginal rectal resection.

A A Shafik1, O El Sibai2, I A Shafik3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a clinical symptom in patients suffering from slow transit and/or obstructed defecation. Proper treatment requires the identification of all associated disorders and the quantification of symptoms. Rectocele can cause the symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of a novel technique of transvaginal stapled rectal resection (TVSRR) using a straight staple line, to treat rectocele.
METHODS: The study included 84 females [median age 51 years (range 29-73 years)], with obstructed defecation, grades II-III rectocele, and multiple abnormalities on defecography. The magnitude and degree of ODS were quantified by the Altomare ODS scoring system. Continence status was evaluated using the Pescatori scoring system. The rectal and vaginal manometric study, the index of patient satisfaction using a visual analog score (VAS), and the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire results were recorded. All patients underwent TVSRR.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. Early postoperative complications were defecatory urgency in seven patients (8.3 %), dyspareunia in two (2.4 %), and rectovaginal fistula in one (1.2 %). Five patients (6 %) had recurrence of ODS symptoms. There was no significant change in continence pre- and postoperatively. The ODS score and VAS revealed significant improvement within the first postoperative year in 94 % of patients. The PAC-QOL questionnaire mean total scores indicated an improvement in both the patient satisfaction and the QOL during the 12-month follow-up. The self-reported definitive outcome was excellent in 46 patients (54.7 %), good in 29 (34.5 %), fairly good in 20 (23.8 %), and poor in five (6.0 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal repair carries no risk of fecal incontinence. Large anterior rectocele is considered the main indication for this technique. Using the linear stapler is a cost-effective, simple, and easy technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constipation; Linear stapler; Obstructed defecation; Rectocele; Vaginal repair

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711102     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1410-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  21 in total

1.  Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defaecation.

Authors:  M L Corman; A Carriero; T Hager; A Herold; D G Jayne; P-A Lehur; D Lomanto; A Longo; A F Mellgren; J Nicholls; P-O Nyström; A J Senagore; A Stuto; S D Wexner
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Anal manometric predictors of significant rectocele in constipated patients.

Authors:  N A Rotholtz; J E Efron; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Transanal rectocele repair using EndoGIA: short-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  M D'Avolio; A Ferrara; C Chimenti
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Predictive factors for postoperative constipation and continence after stapled transanal rectal resection.

Authors:  L Boenicke; J Reibetanz; M Kim; N Schlegel; C-T Germer; C Isbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire.

Authors:  Patrick Marquis; Christine De La Loge; Dominique Dubois; Anne McDermott; Olivier Chassany
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter D R Higgins; John F Johanson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Mario Pescatori; Donato F Altomare; Gian Andrea Binda; Corrado Bottini; Giuseppe Dodi; Vincenzino Filingeri; Giovanni Milito; Marcella Rinaldi; Giovanni Romano; Liana Spazzafumo; Mario Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  The impact of stapled transanal rectal resection on anorectal function in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  Giuliano Reboa; Marco Gipponi; Matteo Ligorio; Matteo Logorio; Paolo Marino; Francesca Lantieri
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study.

Authors:  N J Talley; A L Weaver; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Megan O Schimpf; Cecilia K Wieslander; Ambereen Sleemi; Paula Doyle; You Maria Wu; Ruchira Singh; Ethan M Balk; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Rectal-vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele.

Authors:  Cheng Tan; Man Tan; Jing Geng; Jun Tang; Xin Yang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.