Isabelle Desombere1, Samira Fafi-Kremer2,3,4, Freya Van Houtte1, Patrick Pessaux2,3,5, Ali Farhoudi1, Laura Heydmann2,3, Lieven Verhoye1, Sarah Cole6, Jane A McKeating7, Geert Leroux-Roels1, Thomas F Baumert2,3,5, Arvind H Patel6, Philip Meuleman1. 1. Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 2. Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques, Strasbourg, France. 3. Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 4. Laboratoire de Virologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 5. Institut Hopitalo-Universitaire, Pole Hépato-digestif, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 6. MRC-University of Glasgow Center for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 7. Viral Hepatitis Research Group, Center for Human Virology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, immediately after transplantation, the liver graft of viremic patients universally becomes infected by circulating virus, resulting in accelerated liver disease progression. Currently available direct-acting antiviral therapies have reduced efficacy in patients with ESLD and prophylactic strategies to prevent HCV recurrence are still highly needed. In this study, we compared the ability of two broadly reactive monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), designated 3/11 and AP33, recognizing a distinct, but overlapping, epitope in the viral E2 glycoprotein to protect humanized mice from a patient-derived HCV challenge. Their neutralizing activity was assessed using the HCV pseudoparticles and cell-culture-derived HCV systems expressing multiple patient-derived envelopes and a human-liver chimeric mouse model. HCV RNA was readily detected in all control mice challenged with a patient-derived HCV genotype 1b isolate, whereas 3 of 4 AP33-treated mice were completely protected. In contrast, only one of four 3/11-treated mice remained HCV-RNA negative throughout the observation period, whereas the other 3 had a viral load that was indistinguishable from that in the control group. The increased in vivo efficacy of AP33 was in line with its higher affinity and neutralizing capacity observed in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Although mAbs AP33 and 3/11 target the same region in E2, only mAb AP33 can efficiently protect from challenge with a heterologous HCV population in vivo. Given that mAb AP33 efficiently neutralizes viral variants that escaped the humoral immune response and reinfected the liver graft of transplant patients, it may be a valuable candidate to prevent HCV recurrence. In addition, our data are valuable for the design of a prophylactic vaccine.
UNLABELLED: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, immediately after transplantation, the liver graft of viremic patients universally becomes infected by circulating virus, resulting in accelerated liver disease progression. Currently available direct-acting antiviral therapies have reduced efficacy in patients with ESLD and prophylactic strategies to prevent HCV recurrence are still highly needed. In this study, we compared the ability of two broadly reactive monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), designated 3/11 and AP33, recognizing a distinct, but overlapping, epitope in the viral E2 glycoprotein to protect humanized mice from a patient-derived HCV challenge. Their neutralizing activity was assessed using the HCV pseudoparticles and cell-culture-derived HCV systems expressing multiple patient-derived envelopes and a human-liver chimeric mouse model. HCV RNA was readily detected in all control mice challenged with a patient-derived HCV genotype 1b isolate, whereas 3 of 4 AP33-treated mice were completely protected. In contrast, only one of four 3/11-treated mice remained HCV-RNA negative throughout the observation period, whereas the other 3 had a viral load that was indistinguishable from that in the control group. The increased in vivo efficacy of AP33 was in line with its higher affinity and neutralizing capacity observed in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Although mAbs AP33 and 3/11 target the same region in E2, only mAb AP33 can efficiently protect from challenge with a heterologous HCV population in vivo. Given that mAb AP33 efficiently neutralizes viral variants that escaped the humoral immune response and reinfected the liver graft of transplant patients, it may be a valuable candidate to prevent HCV recurrence. In addition, our data are valuable for the design of a prophylactic vaccine.
Authors: Philip Meuleman; Maria Teresa Catanese; Lieven Verhoye; Isabelle Desombere; Ali Farhoudi; Christopher T Jones; Timothy Sheahan; Katarzyna Grzyb; Riccardo Cortese; Charles M Rice; Geert Leroux-Roels; Alfredo Nicosia Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sandra Ciesek; Thomas von Hahn; Che C Colpitts; Luis M Schang; Martina Friesland; Jörg Steinmann; Michael P Manns; Michael Ott; Heiner Wedemeyer; Philip Meuleman; Thomas Pietschmann; Eike Steinmann Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Andrew J Syder; Haekyung Lee; Mirjam B Zeisel; Joe Grove; Eric Soulier; James Macdonald; Stephine Chow; Julia Chang; Thomas F Baumert; Jane A McKeating; Jeffrey McKelvy; Flossie Wong-Staal Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Gary L Davis; David R Nelson; Norah Terrault; Timothy L Pruett; Thomas D Schiano; Courtney V Fletcher; Christine V Sapan; Laura N Riser; Yufeng Li; Richard J Whitley; John W Gnann Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Meital Gal-Tanamy; Zhen-Yong Keck; MinKyung Yi; Jane A McKeating; Arvind H Patel; Steven K H Foung; Stanley M Lemon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel X Johansson; Cécile Voisset; Alexander W Tarr; Mie Aung; Jonathan K Ball; Jean Dubuisson; Mats A A Persson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zhen-yong Keck; Jinming Xia; Yong Wang; Wenyan Wang; Thomas Krey; Jannick Prentoe; Thomas Carlsen; Angela Ying-Jian Li; Arvind H Patel; Stanley M Lemon; Jens Bukh; Felix A Rey; Steven K H Foung Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Trevor J Morin; Teresa J Broering; Brett A Leav; Barbra M Blair; Kirk J Rowley; Elisabeth N Boucher; Yang Wang; Peter S Cheslock; Michael Knauber; David B Olsen; Steve W Ludmerer; Gyongyi Szabo; Robert W Finberg; Robert H Purcell; Robert E Lanford; Donna M Ambrosino; Deborah C Molrine; Gregory J Babcock Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Jan M Pestka; Mirjam B Zeisel; Edith Bläser; Peter Schürmann; Birke Bartosch; Francois-Loïc Cosset; Arvind H Patel; Helga Meisel; Jens Baumert; Sergei Viazov; Kay Rispeter; Hubert E Blum; Michael Roggendorf; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fernando Aleman; Netanel Tzarum; Leopold Kong; Kenna Nagy; Jiang Zhu; Ian A Wilson; Mansun Law Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ahmed Atef Mesalam; Isabelle Desombere; Ali Farhoudi; Freya Van Houtte; Lieven Verhoye; Jonathan Ball; Jean Dubuisson; Steven K H Foung; Arvind H Patel; Mats A A Persson; Geert Leroux-Roels; Philip Meuleman Journal: Virology Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Sabrina J Merat; Richard Molenkamp; Koen Wagner; Sylvie M Koekkoek; Dorien van de Berg; Etsuko Yasuda; Martino Böhne; Yvonne B Claassen; Bart P Grady; Maria Prins; Arjen Q Bakker; Menno D de Jong; Hergen Spits; Janke Schinkel; Tim Beaumont Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laurent Mailly; Florian Wrensch; Laura Heydmann; Catherine Fauvelle; Nicolas Brignon; Mirjam B Zeisel; Patrick Pessaux; Zhen-Yong Keck; Catherine Schuster; Thomas R Fuerst; Steven K H Foung; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2018-12-30 Impact factor: 10.103
Authors: Daniel J Felmlee; Audrey Coilly; Raymond T Chung; Didier Samuel; Thomas F Baumert Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 71.421