Literature DB >> 26709110

American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.

Aatur D Singhi1, Herbert J Zeh2, Randall E Brand3, Marina N Nikiforova1, Jennifer S Chennat3, Kenneth E Fasanella3, Asif Khalid3, Georgios I Papachristou3, Adam Slivka3, Melissa Hogg2, Kenneth K Lee2, Allan Tsung2, Amer H Zureikat4, Kevin McGrath3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) recently reported evidence-based guidelines for the management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. These guidelines advocate a higher threshold for surgical resection than prior guidelines and imaging surveillance for a considerable number of patients with pancreatic cysts. The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of the AGA guidelines in detecting advanced neoplasia and present an alternative approach to pancreatic cysts.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 225 patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA for pancreatic cysts between January 2014 and May 2015. For each patient, clinical findings, EUS features, cytopathology results, carcinoembryonic antigen analysis, and molecular testing of pancreatic cyst fluid were reviewed. Molecular testing included the assessment of hotspot mutations and deletions for KRAS, GNAS, VHL, TP53, PIK3CA, and PTEN.
RESULTS: Diagnostic pathology results were available for 41 patients (18%), with 13 (6%) harboring advanced neoplasia. Among these cases, the AGA guidelines identified advanced neoplasia with 62% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 82% negative predictive value. Moreover, the AGA guidelines missed 45% of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia. For cases without confirmatory pathology, 27 of 184 patients (15%) with serous cystadenomas (SCAs) based on EUS findings and/or VHL alterations would continue magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance. In comparison, a novel algorithmic pathway using molecular testing of pancreatic cyst fluid detected advanced neoplasias with 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 79% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS: The AGA guidelines were inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia. Furthermore, because the AGA guidelines manage all neoplastic cysts similarly, patients with SCAs will continue to undergo unnecessary MRI surveillance. The results of an alternative approach with integrative molecular testing are encouraging but require further validation.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26709110     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  42 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance: Who, When, and How.

Authors:  Beth Dudley; Randall E Brand
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

2.  Predicting the Grade of Dysplasia of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms Using Cyst Fluid DNA Methylation Markers.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Marco Dal Molin; Seung-Mo Hong; Koji Tamura; Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Hiraku Sedogawa; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Anne Marie Lennon; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Harkirat Singh; Kevin McGrath; Aatur D Singhi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Molecular Diagnostics and Testing for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jaime de la Fuente; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 5.  Pancreatic Cysts in the Elderly.

Authors:  Luis F Lara; Anjuli Luthra; Darwin L Conwell; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

6.  New guidelines for use of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation and risk stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions may be too conservative.

Authors:  Nadav Sahar; Anthony Razzak; Zaheer S Kanji; David L Coy; Richard Kozarek; Andrew S Ross; Michael Gluck; Michael Larsen; Shayan Irani; S Ian Gan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Pancreatic Cysts and Guidelines.

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Endoscopic Ultrasound and Related Technologies for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Disease - Research Gaps and Opportunities: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Authors:  Linda S Lee; Dana K Andersen; Reiko Ashida; William R Brugge; Mimi I Canto; Kenneth J Chang; Suresh T Chari; John DeWitt; Joo Ha Hwang; Mouen A Khashab; Kang Kim; Michael J Levy; Kevin McGrath; Walter G Park; Aatur Singhi; Tyler Stevens; Christopher C Thompson; Mark D Topazian; Michael B Wallace; Sachin Wani; Irving Waxman; Dhiraj Yadav; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Advances in Pancreatic Cancer, Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms, and Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Santhi Swaroop Vege; Stephen J Pandol
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Early detection of pancreatic cancer using DNA-based molecular approaches.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Laura D Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.