| Literature DB >> 26709037 |
Claire M A Haworth1, Kathryn Carter2, Thalia C Eley2, Robert Plomin2.
Abstract
Moderate inverse correlations are typically found between well-being and mental illness. We aimed to investigate the role of genes and environments in explaining the relationships between two aspects of well-being and two measures of internalizing symptoms. Altogether, 4700 pairs of 16-year-old twins contributed data on subjective happiness and life satisfaction, as well as symptoms of depression and emotional problems. Well-being was moderately correlated with internalizing symptoms (range = -0.45, -0.58). Multivariate twin model-fitting indicated both genetic and environmental overlap. Life satisfaction and happiness demonstrated different patterns of overlap, with stronger genetic links between life satisfaction and depression. Non-shared environmental influences were largely specific to each trait. This study supports the theory of mental health and illness being partly (but not entirely) correlated dimensions. There are also significant genetic and environmental factors to identify for well-being that go beyond the absence of mental illness. It is therefore possible that different interventions are needed for treating mental illness and promoting mental health.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26709037 PMCID: PMC5347864 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dev Sci ISSN: 1363-755X
Figure 1Means split by sex and zygosity. MZ = monozygotic twins; DZ = dizygotic twins. Descriptives are presented for one randomly selected member of each twin pair. N values are as follows: All N = 4732–4739; MZ N = 1694–1698; DZ N = 3037–3041; Male N = 2116–2120; Female N = 2615–2619. Supplementary Table 1 includes further information about the standard deviations and ANOVA to test for differences in sex and zygosity. In the model‐fitting analyses we correct for mean effects of sex using a regression procedure.
Phenotypic and twin correlations
| Depression symptoms | Emotional symptoms | Life satisfaction | Subjective happiness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional symptoms | .64 | |||
| Life satisfaction | −.58 | −.49 | ||
| Subjective happiness | −.50 | −.45 | .61 | |
| MZ ( | .42 | .42 | .57 | .41 |
| DZ ( | .27 | .17 | .33 | .21 |
All significant at p < .001; Phenotypic correlations conducted on one randomly selected member of each pair (N range = 4725–4739). N pairs = number of complete twin pairs. Correlations performed on transformed, age‐ and sex‐corrected measures. Twin correlations split by sex and zygosity are included in Supplementary Table 2, with overlapping confidence intervals for our estimates for same‐ and opposite‐sex fraternal twins, and for our male and female pairs. Therefore we conducted our multivariate analyses on a sample with male and female twins combined.
Figure 2Genetic and environmental estimates from the Cholesky decomposition. A = additive genetic; C = shared environment; E = non‐shared environment. Line weights represent the magnitude of the effect. Dotted lines indicate estimates that have confidence intervals overlapping with zero. 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.
Note: The Cholesky decomposition provided the best fit. Fit statistics for alternative models are shown in Supplementary Table 5.
Figure 3Proportion of the phenotypic correlation explained by overlapping genetic, shared environmental and non‐shared environmental influences. These results focus on what is common between the different measures. The phenotypic correlations (shown in Table 1) are broken down into the proportion explained by overlapping genetic and environmental influences. Bivariate A = Proportion of the phenotypic correlation explained by common genetic influences. Bivariate C = Proportion of the phenotypic correlation explained by common shared environmental influences. Bivariate E = Proportion of the phenotypic correlation explained by common non‐shared environmental influences. Confidence intervals for these estimates are shown in Supplementary Table 4.