Literature DB >> 26708775

Low-acuity presentations to regional emergency departments: What is the issue?

Colleen Cheek1, Penny Allen1, Lizzi Shires1, Denise Parry2, Marielle Ruigrok2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore GP-referrals and self-referrals to EDs and factors associated with patients seeking low-acuity care at ED.
METHOD: Retrospective analysis of all ED presentations to Mersey Community Hospital and North West Regional Hospital (Tasmania) between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013. Cross-sectional survey of patients presenting to the EDs for care triaged as low-acuity.
RESULTS: There were 255,365 ED presentations in the retrospective data: 11,252 (4.4%) GP-referrals and 218,205 (85.4%) self-referrals. At ED 49% of GP-referrals were triaged ATS 4 or 5 and 35% of self-referrals were triaged ATS 1-3. There were 138 (84.2%) low-acuity patients who completed the survey; predominantly, all attended for acute injury or illness. Single point-of-care convenience was most commonly selected (71%) as a reason for attending ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Over 85% of patients who seek emergency care in this region self-refer, so understanding health-seeking behaviour is important. Most low-acuity patients are acutely injured or unwell, and the decision to go to ED is based on their perception of accessibility of expertise aligned with their need. The term 'GP-type' is misleading in this context and should not be used. Providing low-acuity care in parallel with providing a specialised emergency service meets the needs of the local community and is likely to be the lowest cost model in a regional and rural area. Funding models must reflect the actual cost of delivering this important service rather than presentation types.
© 2015 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost; demand; funding; general practice; health-seeking behaviour; low-acuity presentations; regional hospital

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708775     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  5 in total

1.  Rural Patients' Perceptions of Their Potentially Preventable Hospitalisation: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrew Ridge; Gregory M Peterson; Bastian M Seidel; Vinah Anderson; Rosie Nash
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-01-04

2.  Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrew Ridge; Gregory M Peterson; Bastian M Seidel; Vinah Anderson; Rosie Nash
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  NHAMCS Validation of Emergency Severity Index as an Indicator of Emergency Department Resource Utilization.

Authors:  Michael B Hocker; Charles J Gerardo; B Jason Theiling; John Villani; Rebecca Donohoe; Hirsh Sandesara; Alexander T Limkakeng
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-08

4.  Development and evaluation of a code frame to identify potential primary care presentations in the hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Heike Schütze; Rhyannan Rees; Stephen Asha; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  'Clinically unnecessary' use of emergency and urgent care: A realist review of patients' decision making.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Janice Connell; Jaqui Long; Joanne Coster
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.377

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.