Literature DB >> 26708375

The Midterm Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Children.

Takeshi Shinkawa1, Chiajung K Lu2, Carl Chipman2, Xinyu Tang3, Jeffrey M Gossett3, Michiaki Imamura2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in children. This is a retrospective review of all bioprosthetic PVR in children (≤ 20-year old) between 1992 and 2013 at a single institution. Most outcomes studied included pulmonary valve reintervention and bioprosthetic valve function. A total of 136 bioprosthetic PVRs were identified for 123 patients. The median age and body weight at the time of operation were 13.2 years and 48.4 kg. There were 1 early death and 3 late deaths during the median follow-up of 7.2 years (0-22.0 years). The actuarial transplant-free survival was 97.6% at 10 years. There were 43 bioprosthesis reinterventions with 29 reoperations and 14 catheter-based interventions. The freedom from bioprosthesis reintervention was 89.6% and 55.0% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Echocardiographic bioprosthesis dysfunction (≥ moderate bioprosthesis insufficiency, ≥ 50 mmHg peak gradient through bioprosthesis, or bioprosthesis endocarditis with vegetation) was found in 57 bioprostheses. The freedom from bioprosthesis dysfunction was 74.0% and 32.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Results from the Cox proportional hazards models showed that age had significant association with freedom from bioprosthesis reintervention and freedom from bioprosthesis dysfunction (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03), whereas bioprosthesis type had nonsignificant association with freedom from bioprosthesis dysfunction (P = 0.068). Bioprosthetic PVR in children had excellent early outcomes but rapidly deteriorating midterm outcomes. Careful and close follow-up are necessary for children with bioprosthesis in the pulmonary position.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHD; congenital heart disease; pediatric; pulmonary valve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708375     DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1043-0679


  6 in total

1.  The ideal substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with congenital heart disease: an unsolved dilemma.

Authors:  Andrea Garatti; Alessandro Giamberti; Alessandro Frigiola; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation: Neither Interventional Nor Surgery Fits All.

Authors:  Antonio F Corno
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Trifecta St. Jude medical® aortic valve in pulmonary position.

Authors:  Antonio F Corno; Alan G Dawson; Aidan P Bolger; Branco Mimic; Suhair O Shebani; Gregory J Skinner; Simone Speggiorin
Journal:  Nano Rev Exp       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Assessment of untreated fresh autologous pericardium as material for construction of heart valve: Result at 5 years.

Authors:  Amitabh Arya; Navneet Kumar Srivastava; Shantanu Pande; Shashank Tripathi; Surendra Kumar Agarwal; Prabhat Tewari; Aditya Kapoor
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Can Heart Valve Decellularization Be Standardized? A Review of the Parameters Used for the Quality Control of Decellularization Processes.

Authors:  F Naso; A Gandaglia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17

6.  Assessment of normal hemodynamic profile of mechanical pulmonary prosthesis by doppler echocardiography: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maryam Shojaeifard; Ali Daryanavard; Arman Karimi Behnagh; Maryam Moradian; Sajjad Erami; Hossein Dehghani Mohammad Abadi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.