Literature DB >> 26708336

rCGH: a comprehensive array-based genomic profile platform for precision medicine.

Frederic Commo1, Justin Guinney2, Charles Ferté1, Brian Bot2, Celine Lefebvre3, Jean-Charles Soria4, Fabrice André4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We present rCGH, a comprehensive array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis workflow, integrating computational improvements and functionalities specifically designed for precision medicine. rCGH supports the major microarray platforms, ensures a full traceability and facilitates profiles interpretation and decision-making through sharable interactive visualizations.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The rCGH R package is available on bioconductor (under Artistic-2.0). The aCGH-viewer is available at https://fredcommo.shinyapps.io/aCGH_viewer, and the application implementation is freely available for installation at https://github.com/fredcommo/aCGH_viewer CONTACT: frederic.commo@gustaveroussy.fr SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708336      PMCID: PMC4848396          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

Precision medicine aims at identifying individual cancer patients’ molecular alterations—such as copy number alterations (CNAs), gene mutations or fusions and protein expressions—and matching these to targeted therapies (André ; Tsimberidou ). While next-generation sequencing is now widely used for identifying mutations, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a common platform for detecting CNAs (André ; Laurent-Puig ): the advantages of aCGH over next-generation sequencing technologies include lower cost, rapid turn-around time and lower computational overhead. In the context of precision medicine, CNA analysis—alongside somatic mutation analysis—is critical for identifying clinically actionable genomic aberrations. However, significant technical challenges remain in the processing of aCGH data. Addressing these challenges requires new state-of-the-art tools for coordinating analysis and interpreting results.

2 Methods and implementation

An aCGH analysis can be decomposed into four distinct phases (Supplementary Fig. S1): (i) log2 relative ratios (LRR) calculation (the sample DNA signals against a normal 2-copy DNA reference), (ii) profile centralization, (iii) profile segmentation and (iv) genomic profile interpretation to identify actionable genes affected by a CNA, to propose a matched therapeutic orientation. The profile centralization defines a baseline—a neutral 2-copies level—from which CNA are estimated. We previously discussed the impact of centralization on aCGH analysis (Commo ), and rCGH implements the procedure described in the same article. Briefly, the vector of LRRs is considered as a mixture of Gaussian populations, and their respective proportion and parameters are estimated using an Expectation-Maximization algorithm. By default, the sub-population with a density peak higher than 50% of the highest density is considered as representing a neutral 2-copy state. Its mean is then used for centralizing the profile. The segmentation step aims at identifying breakpoints in the LRRs continuity, each delimiting potentially gained or lost DNA segments. The rCGH segmentation relies on the circular binary segmentation (CBS) (Olshen ), implemented in the DNAcopy R package. Although this algorithm is widely used (Willenbrock and Fridlyand, 2005), it suffers from several parameters to be specified a priori. In particular, the ‘sdundo’ segmentation method mainly relies on two parameters: (i) a significance level α for the statistical test to accept points as breakpoints and (ii) the allowed difference between two consecutive segment means to keep them distinct (expressed in DNAcopy as a number of standard deviations,undo.SD). Instead of using arbitrary values, rCGH introduces a data-driven parameterization: given a fixed α, the corresponding optimal ‘undo.SD’ value is estimated from the median absolute deviation, a widely used noise estimator (Supplementary Methods). This optimization greatly facilitates the use of this algorithm for routine practice and standardizes the parameterization through a data-driven rule. In precision medicine, the decision-making regarding a therapeutic orientation relies on the actionable gene’s status, defined with respect to gain/loss thresholds and alteration lengths. Defining such thresholds is often arbitrary: (i) there is no consensus on which LRR values correspond to biologically relevant CNAs, (ii) focal alterations, possibly referring to significantly recurrent alterations within a cohort (Mermel ; Yuan ), are not clearly defined when transposed to the interpretation of unique profiles. rCGH provides an interactive visualization tool that allows the user to visualize and manipulate genomic profiles from within a web interface (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

. Interactive visualization. The genomic profile and the loss of heterozygosity profile (when available) are displayed on the CGH profile tab, while the gene values are accessible through the Genes table tab. The command panel (on left) can be used to display a gene of interest, to recenter the entire profile and to specify several decision parameters (gain/loss threshold, segment length). Gene values are updated automatically, and profiles and table can be re-exported after modification

. Interactive visualization. The genomic profile and the loss of heterozygosity profile (when available) are displayed on the CGH profile tab, while the gene values are accessible through the Genes table tab. The command panel (on left) can be used to display a gene of interest, to recenter the entire profile and to specify several decision parameters (gain/loss threshold, segment length). Gene values are updated automatically, and profiles and table can be re-exported after modification Two primary perspectives are provided: visualization of CNAs along DNA strands or a gene-centric table. The latter includes gene-specific LRR values and corresponding segment lengths. When available on microarrays, loss of heterozygosity expressed as the A/B allelic difference is also provided. A command window provides control over display parameters including re-centering, merging short segments and gain or loss thresholds (see Supplementary Methods for a full description). Finally, both the genomic profile and the genes table can be re-exported, in ready-to-publish quality and xls format, respectively, including the changes applied on the profile.

3 Supported files

As input rCGH supports Agilent Human CGH data, from 44K to 400K, and Affymetrix, SNP6 and cytoScanHD. All are provided in text format by platform-specific softwares: standard Agilent text files are exported from Agilent Feature Extraction software (FE), while Affymetrix cychp.txt, cnchp.txt or probeset.txt files are obtained by processing Affymetrix CEL files through ChAS or Affymetrix Power Tools (APT) softwares: both are freely available at http://www.affymetrix.com. Custom arrays can also be supported, provided the data format complies with the requirements (see Supplementary Methods for details).

4 rCGH outputs

rCGH stores all the original and computed data, as well as the workflow parameters, to ensure traceability. Segmentation tables are of the same format as standard CBS outputs, completed with the segment lengths and the within-segment LRR standard deviation.

5 Web server version

Independently of rCGH, we have developed aCGH-viewer: an interactive visualization available as a web application. Its implementation is freely available for installation on a server. As inputs, the application requires segmentation tables built through either rCGH, or any other workflow, provided the data are of the same form as the standard CBS outputs. This application is designed for use by clinicians and biologists and does not require bioinformatic expertise. It allows individual profiles to be shared, discussed and annotated in tumor board committees and finally saved for traceability (see Supplementary Methods for details).

6 Conclusion

In this work, we present the R package rCGH: a comprehensive aCGH analysis workflow, with features and functionalities particularly well adapted to precision medicine. rCGH ensures the traceability of the entire process of individual samples and provides interactive visualization tools allowing to better interpret—and potentially reprocess—genomic profiles, individually. The web-server application can assist oncologists in reviewing copy-number alterations in genomic profiles and identifying matched therapeutic orientations.

Funding

This work was supported by the Integrative Cancer Biology Program of the National Cancer Institute (U54CA149237 to F.C., C.F. and J.G.), Unicancer, the ARC foundation, the Breast Cancer Research foundation and Odyssea. Conflict of Interest: none declared.
  9 in total

1.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.

Authors:  Hanni Willenbrock; Jane Fridlyand
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Targeting FGFR with dovitinib (TKI258): preclinical and clinical data in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice André; Thomas Bachelot; Mario Campone; Florence Dalenc; Jose M Perez-Garcia; Sara A Hurvitz; Nicholas Turner; Hope Rugo; John W Smith; Stephanie Deudon; Michael Shi; Yong Zhang; Andrea Kay; Diana Graus Porta; Alejandro Yovine; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Personalized medicine for patients with advanced cancer in the phase I program at MD Anderson: validation and landmark analyses.

Authors:  Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Sijin Wen; David S Hong; Jennifer J Wheler; Gerald S Falchook; Siqing Fu; Sarina Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Filip Janku; Kenneth Aldape; Yang Ye; Razelle Kurzrock; Donald Berry
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Laurent-Puig; Anne Cayre; Gilles Manceau; Emmanuel Buc; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Thierry Lecomte; Philippe Rougier; Astrid Lievre; Bruno Landi; Valérie Boige; Michel Ducreux; Marc Ychou; Fréderic Bibeau; Olivier Bouché; Julia Reid; Steven Stone; Frédérique Penault-Llorca
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER).

Authors:  Fabrice André; Thomas Bachelot; Frederic Commo; Mario Campone; Monica Arnedos; Véronique Dieras; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Ludovic Lacroix; Pascale Cohen; David Gentien; Jose Adélaide; Florence Dalenc; Anthony Goncalves; Christelle Levy; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Jacques Bonneterre; Claudia Lefeuvre; Marta Jimenez; Thomas Filleron; Hervé Bonnefoi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Impact of centralization on aCGH-based genomic profiles for precision medicine in oncology.

Authors:  F Commo; C Ferté; J C Soria; S H Friend; F André; J Guinney
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers.

Authors:  Craig H Mermel; Steven E Schumacher; Barbara Hill; Matthew L Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Comparative analysis of methods for identifying recurrent copy number alterations in cancer.

Authors:  Xiguo Yuan; Junying Zhang; Shengli Zhang; Guoqiang Yu; Yue Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Fusion-mediated chromosomal instability promotes aneuploidy patterns that resemble human tumors.

Authors:  Lucile Delespaul; Candice Merle; Tom Lesluyes; Pauline Lagarde; Sophie Le Guellec; Gaëlle Pérot; Jessica Baud; Martina Carlotti; Coralie Danet; Murielle Fèvre; Benoit Rousseau; Stéphanie Durrieu; Martin Teichmann; Jean-Michel Coindre; Lydia Lartigue; Frédéric Chibon
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Plasticity of Extrachromosomal and Intrachromosomal BRAF Amplifications in Overcoming Targeted Therapy Dosage Challenges.

Authors:  Kai Song; Jenna K Minami; Arthur Huang; Siavash R Dehkordi; Shirley H Lomeli; Jens Luebeck; Mark H Goodman; Gatien Moriceau; Oscar Krijgsman; Prashanthi Dharanipragada; Trevor Ridgley; William P Crosson; Jesus Salazar; Eli Pazol; Gabriel Karin; Rachana Jayaraman; Nikolas G Balanis; Salwan Alhani; Kyle Sheu; Johanna Ten Hoeve; Amelia Palermo; Stephen E Motika; T Niroshi Senaratne; Kim H Paraiso; Paul J Hergenrother; P Nagesh Rao; Asha S Multani; Daniel S Peeper; Vineet Bafna; Roger S Lo; Thomas G Graeber
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 38.272

3.  Robust pathway-based multi-omics data integration using directed random walks for survival prediction in multiple cancer studies.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Jaesik Kim; Jeong-Hyeon Moon; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Identification of a Gene-Expression-Based Surrogate of Genomic Instability during Oral Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Eléonore Truchard; Chloé Bertolus; Pierre Martinez; Emilie Thomas; Pierre Saintigny; Jean-Philippe Foy
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Multi-omics integration for neuroblastoma clinical endpoint prediction.

Authors:  Margherita Francescatto; Marco Chierici; Setareh Rezvan Dezfooli; Alessandro Zandonà; Giuseppe Jurman; Cesare Furlanello
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  p38 Mediates Resistance to FGFR Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Izabela Zarczynska; Monika Gorska-Arcisz; Alexander Jorge Cortez; Katarzyna Aleksandra Kujawa; Agata Małgorzata Wilk; Andrzej Cezary Skladanowski; Aleksandra Stanczak; Monika Skupinska; Maciej Wieczorek; Katarzyna Marta Lisowska; Rafal Sadej; Kamila Kitowska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.