Literature DB >> 26708030

DUSTER: dynamic contrast enhance up-sampled temporal resolution analysis method.

Gilad Liberman1, Yoram Louzoun2, Moran Artzi3, Guy Nadav4, James R Ewing5, Dafna Ben Bashat6.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI using Tofts' model for estimating vascular permeability is widely accepted, yet inter-tissue differences in bolus arrival time (BAT) are generally ignored. In this work we propose a method, incorporating the BAT in the analysis, demonstrating its applicability and advantages in healthy subjects and patients. A method for DCE Up Sampled TEmporal Resolution (DUSTER) analysis is proposed which includes: baseline T1 map using DESPOT1 analyzed with flip angle (FA) correction; preprocessing; raw-signal-to-T1-to-concentration time curves (CTC) conversion; automatic arterial input function (AIF) extraction at temporal super-resolution; model fitting with model selection while incorporating BAT in the pharmacokinetic (PK) model, and fits contrast agent CTC while using exhaustive search in the BAT dimension in super-resolution. The method was applied to simulated data and to human data from 17 healthy subjects, six patients with glioblastoma, and two patients following stroke. BAT values were compared to time-to-peak (TTP) values extracted from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Results show that the method improved the AIF estimation and allowed extraction of the BAT with a resolution of 0.8 s. In simulations, lower mean relative errors were detected for all PK parameters extracted using DUSTER compared to analysis without BAT correction (vp:5% vs. 20%, Ktrans: 9% vs. 24% and Kep: 8% vs. 17%, respectively), and BAT estimates demonstrated high correlations (r = 0.94, p < 1e− 10) with true values. In real data, high correlations between BAT values were detected when extracted from data acquired with high temporal resolution (2 s) and sub-sampled standard resolution data (6 s) (mean r = 0.85,p < 1e− 10). BAT and TTP values were significantly correlated in the different brain regions in healthy subjects (mean r = 0.72,p = < 1e− 3), as were voxel-wise comparisons in patients (mean r = 0.89, p < 1e− 10). In conclusion, incorporating BAT in DCE analysis improves estimation accuracy for the AIF and the PK parameters while providing an additional clinically important parameter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bolus arrival time; DUSTER; Dynamic contrast enhancement; Temporal super resolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708030     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  3 in total

1.  Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced vp parameter in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Moran Artzi; Gilad Liberman; Deborah T Blumenthal; Felix Bokstein; Orna Aizenstein; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Vascular territorial segmentation and volumetric blood flow measurement using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the brain.

Authors:  Oren Geri; Shelly I Shiran; Jonathan Roth; Moran Artzi; Liat Ben-Sira; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Jay Acharya; Richard Frayne; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 29.146

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.