J Ponsford1, N K Lee2, D Wong1, A McKay1, K Haines1, Y Alway1, M Downing1, C Furtado1, M L O'Donnell3. 1. Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University,Clayton,Victoria,Australia. 2. National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction,Flinders University,SA,Australia. 3. Phoenix Australia,University of Melbourne,Victoria,Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and depression are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), often co-occurring. This study evaluated the efficacy of a 9-week cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program in reducing anxiety and depression and whether a three-session motivational interviewing (MI) preparatory intervention increased treatment response. METHOD: A randomized parallel three-group design was employed. Following diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, 75 participants with mild-severe TBI (mean age 42.2 years, mean post-traumatic amnesia 22 days) were randomly assigned to an Adapted CBT group: (1) MI + CBT (n = 26), or (2) non-directive counseling (NDC) + CBT (n = 26); or a (3) waitlist control (WC, n = 23) group. Groups did not differ in baseline demographics, injury severity, anxiety or depression. MI and CBT interventions were guided by manuals adapted for individuals with TBI. Three CBT booster sessions were provided at week 21 to intervention groups. RESULTS: Using intention-to-treat analyses, random-effects regressions controlling for baseline scores revealed that Adapted CBT groups (MI + CBT and NDC + CBT) showed significantly greater reduction in anxiety on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.07 to -0.06] and depression on the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (95% CI -5.61 to -0.12) (primary outcomes), and greater gains in psychosocial functioning on Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale (95% CI 0.04-3.69) (secondary outcome) over 30 weeks post-baseline relative to WC. The group receiving MI + CBT did not show greater gains than the group receiving NDC + CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that modified CBT with booster sessions over extended periods may alleviate anxiety and depression following TBI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and depression are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), often co-occurring. This study evaluated the efficacy of a 9-week cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program in reducing anxiety and depression and whether a three-session motivational interviewing (MI) preparatory intervention increased treatment response. METHOD: A randomized parallel three-group design was employed. Following diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, 75 participants with mild-severe TBI (mean age 42.2 years, mean post-traumatic amnesia 22 days) were randomly assigned to an Adapted CBT group: (1) MI + CBT (n = 26), or (2) non-directive counseling (NDC) + CBT (n = 26); or a (3) waitlist control (WC, n = 23) group. Groups did not differ in baseline demographics, injury severity, anxiety or depression. MI and CBT interventions were guided by manuals adapted for individuals with TBI. Three CBT booster sessions were provided at week 21 to intervention groups. RESULTS: Using intention-to-treat analyses, random-effects regressions controlling for baseline scores revealed that Adapted CBT groups (MI + CBT and NDC + CBT) showed significantly greater reduction in anxiety on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.07 to -0.06] and depression on the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (95% CI -5.61 to -0.12) (primary outcomes), and greater gains in psychosocial functioning on Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale (95% CI 0.04-3.69) (secondary outcome) over 30 weeks post-baseline relative to WC. The group receiving MI + CBT did not show greater gains than the group receiving NDC + CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that modified CBT with booster sessions over extended periods may alleviate anxiety and depression following TBI.
Authors: Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Laura Campbell-Sills; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Steven G Heeringa; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Xiaoying Sun; Sonia Jain; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jesse R Fann; Charles H Bombardier; Nancy Temkin; Peter Esselman; Catherine Warms; Jason Barber; Sureyya Dikmen Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Matthew P White; Nicola L Yeo; Peeter Vassiljev; Rikard Lundstedt; Mattias Wallergård; Maria Albin; Mare Lõhmus Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 2.570