Literature DB >> 26707982

Communication masking in marine mammals: A review and research strategy.

Christine Erbe1, Colleen Reichmuth2, Kane Cunningham3, Klaus Lucke4, Robert Dooling5.   

Abstract

Underwater noise, whether of natural or anthropogenic origin, has the ability to interfere with the way in which marine mammals receive acoustic signals (i.e., for communication, social interaction, foraging, navigation, etc.). This phenomenon, termed auditory masking, has been well studied in humans and terrestrial vertebrates (in particular birds), but less so in marine mammals. Anthropogenic underwater noise seems to be increasing in parts of the world's oceans and concerns about associated bioacoustic effects, including masking, are growing. In this article, we review our understanding of masking in marine mammals, summarise data on marine mammal hearing as they relate to masking (including audiograms, critical ratios, critical bandwidths, and auditory integration times), discuss masking release processes of receivers (including comodulation masking release and spatial release from masking) and anti-masking strategies of signalers (e.g. Lombard effect), and set a research framework for improved assessment of potential masking in marine mammals.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiogram; Comodulation masking release; Critical band; Critical ratio; Marine mammal; Masking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707982     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  15 in total

1.  Broadband ship noise and its potential impacts on Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: Implications for conservation and management.

Authors:  Mingming Liu; Lijun Dong; Mingli Lin; Songhai Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals.

Authors:  Brian K Branstetter; Jillian M Sills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Avoiding sharp accelerations can mitigate the impacts of a Ferry's radiated noise on the St. Lawrence whales.

Authors:  Dominic Lagrois; Clément Chion; Jean-François Sénécal; Camille Kowalski; Robert Michaud; Valeria Vergara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Limited vocal compensation for elevated ambient noise in bearded seals: implications for an industrializing Arctic Ocean.

Authors:  Michelle E H Fournet; Margherita Silvestri; Christopher W Clark; Holger Klinck; Aaron N Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The influence of variations in background noise on Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) detection of boat noise and vocalizations.

Authors:  Athena M Rycyk; Gordon B Bauer; Randall S Wells; Joseph C Gaspard Iii; David A Mann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Captive Bottlenose Dolphins Do Discriminate Human-Made Sounds Both Underwater and in the Air.

Authors:  Alice Lima; Mélissa Sébilleau; Martin Boye; Candice Durand; Martine Hausberger; Alban Lemasson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Non-auditory, electrophysiological potentials preceding dolphin biosonar click production.

Authors:  James J Finneran; Jason Mulsow; Ryan Jones; Dorian S Houser; Alyssa W Accomando; Sam H Ridgway
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Northern bottlenose whales in a pristine environment respond strongly to close and distant navy sonar signals.

Authors:  Paul J Wensveen; Saana Isojunno; Rune R Hansen; Alexander M von Benda-Beckmann; Lars Kleivane; Sander van IJsselmuide; Frans-Peter A Lam; Petter H Kvadsheim; Stacy L DeRuiter; Charlotte Curé; Tomoko Narazaki; Peter L Tyack; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Underwater sound from vessel traffic reduces the effective communication range in Atlantic cod and haddock.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Sofie M Van Parijs; Leila T Hatch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In-air hearing in Hawaiian monk seals: implications for understanding the auditory biology of Monachinae seals.

Authors:  Brandi Ruscher; Jillian M Sills; Beau P Richter; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.