Literature DB >> 26707008

Prevalence and risk factors of steatosis after liver transplantation and patient outcomes.

Irena Hejlova1, Eva Honsova2, Eva Sticova2, Vera Lanska3, Tomas Hucl1, Julius Spicak1, Milan Jirsa4, Pavel Trunecka5.   

Abstract

Steatosis occurs frequently after liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to determine the prevalence of steatosis in adult LT recipients, to determine the effects of significant (>33%; grades 2-3) steatosis on patient survival, and to identify risk factors for the development of significant steatosis and its effect on fibrosis progression. We retrospectively examined 2360 posttransplant biopsies of 548 LT recipients. Survival was compared between patients with significant steatosis and those with grades 0-1 steatosis. Patients with significant steatosis were compared to controls without steatosis (grade 0) for clinical and laboratory factors and fibrosis progression. Steatosis was found in 309 (56.4%) patients, including 93 (17.0%) patients with significant steatosis. Steatohepatitis (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥ 5) was diagnosed in 57 (10.4%) patients. The prevalence of steatosis increased from 30.3% at 1 year to 47.6% at 10 years after LT (P < 0.001). Survival times did not differ between groups (P = 0.29). On multivariate analysis of pretransplant factors and initial immunosuppression (IS), alcohol-induced cirrhosis (P < 0.001) and high body mass index (BMI; P = 0.002) were associated with the development of significant steatosis, whereas increased levels of alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.01) and mycophenolate mofetil given initially (P = 0.009) appeared to protect against significant steatosis. On multivariate analysis of posttransplant factors, high BMI (P < 0.001), serum triglycerides (P < 0.001), alcohol consumption (P = 0.005), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (P = 0.048) were associated with significant steatosis, whereas high creatinine (P = 0.02) appeared to protect against significant steatosis. Significant steatosis was not associated with a higher fibrosis stage (P = 0.62). Posttransplant steatosis affects 56.4% of LT recipients, and the prevalence increases with time after LT. Recipient factors and types of IS affect the risk for significant steatosis, which is not associated with a higher fibrosis stage or worse patient survival. Liver Transplantation 22 644-655 2016 AASLD.
© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26707008     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and implications on cardiovascular outcomes in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Benedict J Maliakkal
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-05

2.  Host factors are dominant in the development of post-liver transplant non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Salih Boga; Armando Salim Munoz-Abraham; Manuel I Rodriguez-Davalos; Sukru H Emre; Dhanpat Jain; Michael L Schilsky
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-28

3.  Medical Management of Metabolic Complications of Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Abbey Barnard; Peter Konyn; Sammy Saab
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Metabolic mechanisms for and treatment of NAFLD or NASH occurring after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Amedeo Lonardo; Alessandro Mantovani; Salvatore Petta; Amedeo Carraro; Christopher D Byrne; Giovanni Targher
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 47.564

Review 5.  Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pathophysiology of Recurrence and Clinical Challenges.

Authors:  Naga Swetha Samji; Rajanshu Verma; Krishna Chaitanya Keri; Ashwani K Singal; Aijaz Ahmed; Mary Rinella; David Bernstein; Manal F Abdelmalek; Sanjaya K Satapathy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Impact of Donor and Recipient Clinical Characteristics and Hepatic Histology on Steatosis/Fibrosis Following Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Oren Shaked; Jack Demetris; Josh Levitsky; Sandy Feng; Bao-Li Loza; Jeff Punch; Jorge Reyes; Goran Klintmalm; Whitney Jackson; Michele DesMarais; Peter Sayre; Abraham Shaked; K Rajender Reddy
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.385

7.  Impact of Graft Steatosis on Postoperative Complications after Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Emad Ali Ahmed; Ashraf Mohammad El-Badry; Federico Mocchegiani; Roberto Montalti; Asem Elsani Ali Hassan; Alaa Ahmed Redwan; Marco Vivarelli
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2018-10-18

8.  Serum miR-33a is associated with steatosis and inflammation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Denisa Erhartova; Monika Cahova; Helena Dankova; Marie Heczkova; Irena Mikova; Eva Sticova; Julius Spicak; Ondrej Seda; Pavel Trunecka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease after Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Akshay Shetty; Fanny Giron; Mukul K Divatia; Muhammad I Ahmad; Sudha Kodali; David Victor
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 10.  Liver transplantation and alcoholic liver disease: History, controversies, and considerations.

Authors:  Claudio Augusto Marroni; Alfeu Medeiros Fleck; Sabrina Alves Fernandes; Lucas Homercher Galant; Marcos Mucenic; Mario Henrique de Mattos Meine; Guilherme Mariante-Neto; Ajacio Bandeira de Mello Brandão
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.