Literature DB >> 26705102

The effect of the time interval between diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and radical cystectomy on staging and survival: A Netherlands Cancer Registry analysis.

Harman Maxim Bruins1, Katja K H Aben2, Tom J Arends3, Antoine G van der Heijden3, Alfred J Witjes3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data from single-center series suggest that a delay in time to radical cystectomy (RC) more than 3 months after diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with pathological upstaging and decreased survival. However, limited data is available from population-based studies. In this study, the effect of delayed RC was assessed in a nationwide cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RC between 2006 and 2010 with primary clinical T2-T4N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer were selected using the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry was supplemented with data from the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology database in case of incomplete information. The cohort was divided in patients who underwent RC ≤3 months (group I) vs. patients who underwent RC >3 months (group II). Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC, variables associated with delayed RC >3 and the effect of delayed RC on staging and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and patients who did not.
RESULTS: A total of 1,782 patients were included. Median follow-up time was 5.1 years for living patients and 1.3 years for deceased patients. Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC was 50 days (interquartile range: 27 days) and 93% of patients underwent RC≤3 months. Patients older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.77), referred for RC (OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.69), and treated in a university hospital (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.56) were less likely to undergo RC≤3 months. Pathologic upstaging rate (43.9% vs. 42.1%) and node-positive disease rate (20.2% vs. 21.7%) did not differ for group I and II. Delayed RC>3 months was not associated with decreased OS adjusting for confounding variables (hazard ratio = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.91-1.48; P = 0.25). Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy (n = 105) was 133 days (interquartile range: 62 days). Adjusting for confounding variables, delayed RC>3 months was not associated with OS (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.45-1.82).
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patient underwent RC within 3 months after diagnosis of MIBC, as recommended in the European Association of Urology MIBC guideline. Delayed RC for more than 3 months had no adverse effect on staging and survival.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Overall survival; Radical cystectomy; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26705102     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  7 in total

1.  Optimization of Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Radiomics on Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Martijn P A Starmans; Li Shen Ho; Fokko Smits; Nick Beije; Inge de Kruijff; Joep J de Jong; Diederik M Somford; Egbert R Boevé; Ed Te Slaa; Evelyne C C Cauberg; Sjoerd Klaver; Antoine G van der Heijden; Carl J Wijburg; Addy C M van de Luijtgaarden; Harm H E van Melick; Ella Cauffman; Peter de Vries; Rens Jacobs; Wiro J Niessen; Jacob J Visser; Stefan Klein; Joost L Boormans; Astrid A M van der Veldt
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-30

Review 2.  Contemporary best practice in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Gautier Marcq; Edouard Jarry; Idir Ouzaid; Jean-François Hermieu; François Henon; Jean-Christophe Fantoni; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Development of a Prospective Data Registry System for Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Incorporated in the Electronic Patient File System.

Authors:  Murat Akand; Tim Muilwijk; Jan Cornelissen; Siska Van Bruwaene; Kathy Vander Eeckt; Frederic Baekelandt; Pieter Mattelaer; Raf Van Reusel; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Steven Joniau; Frank Van Der Aa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Novel Therapeutic Opportunities in Neoadjuvant Setting in Urothelial Cancers: A New Horizon Opened by Molecular Classification and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Iacovino; Chiara Carmen Miceli; Marco De Felice; Biagio Barone; Luca Pompella; Francesco Chiancone; Erika Di Zazzo; Giuseppe Tirino; Carminia Maria Della Corte; Ciro Imbimbo; Ferdinando De Vita; Felice Crocetto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on delaying surgery for urothelial carcinoma of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for the COVID19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Wei Shen Tan; Wei Phin Tan; Teck Wei Tan; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Kari A O Tikkinen; Ashish Kamat; Shomik Sengupta; Maxwell V Meng; Shahrokh Shariat; Morgan Roupret; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev; Yew Lam Chong; Dmitry Enikeev; Gianluca Giannarini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  A retrospective evaluation of preoperative anemia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial urinary bladder cancer, with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gustaf Klinga; Amir Sherif
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 7.  The Role of Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Cattaneo; Giovanni Motterle; Filiberto Zattoni; Alessandro Morlacco; Fabrizio Dal Moro
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.