Literature DB >> 26704255

Effects of Subdural Monopolar Cortical Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitative Training on Behavioral and Neurophysiological Recovery After Cortical Ischemic Stroke in Adult Squirrel Monkeys.

Erik J Plautz1, Scott Barbay2, Shawn B Frost2, Elena V Zoubina3, Ann M Stowe4, Numa Dancause5, Ines Eisner-Janowicz2, Scott D Bury2, Michael D Taylor2, Randolph J Nudo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cortical stimulation (CS) combined with rehabilitative training (RT) has proven effective for enhancing poststroke functional recovery in rats, but human clinical trials have had mixed outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of CS/RT versus RT in a nonhuman primate model of cortical ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Squirrel monkeys learned a pellet retrieval task, then received an infarct to the distal forelimb (DFL) representation of primary motor cortex. A subdural monopolar electrode was implanted over the spared DFL representation in dorsal premotor cortex (PMD). Seven weeks postinfarct, monkeys underwent 4 to 6 weeks of RT (n = 8) or CS/RT (n = 7; 100 Hz, cathodal current) therapy. Behavioral performance was assessed before and after infarct, prior to therapy, and 1 and 12 weeks posttherapy (follow-up). The primary outcome measure was motor performance at 1 week posttherapy. Secondary outcomes included follow-up performance at 12 weeks and treatment-related changes in neurophysiological maps of spared DFL representations.
RESULTS: While postinfarct performance deficits were found in all monkeys, both groups demonstrated similar recovery profiles, with no difference in motor recovery between the RT and CS/RT groups. Posttherapy, PMD DFL area was significantly expanded in the RT group but not the CS/RT group. A significant relationship was found between motor recovery and DFL expansion in premotor cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the specific parameters utilized here were not optimal for promoting behavioral recovery in nonhuman primates. Though CS/RT has consistently shown efficacy in rat stroke models, the present finding has cautionary implications for translation of CS/RT therapy to clinical populations.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implanted stimulation electrodes; neuronal plasticity; premotor cortex; primary motor cortex; primate

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26704255      PMCID: PMC4732886          DOI: 10.1177/1545968315619701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  53 in total

1.  Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich; T Prejean; R Grenda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Chronic epidural motor cortical stimulation for movement disorders.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.

Authors:  Timothy H Murphy; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Enduring Poststroke Motor Functional Improvements by a Well-Timed Combination of Motor Rehabilitative Training and Cortical Stimulation in Rats.

Authors:  Amber J O'Bryant; DeAnna L Adkins; Austen A Sitko; Hannah L Combs; Sarah K Nordquist; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: case report.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Brown; Helmi Lutsep; Steven C Cramer; Martin Weinand
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.448

6.  Corticospinal terminations in two new-world primates: further evidence that corticomotoneuronal connections provide part of the neural substrate for manual dexterity.

Authors:  G A Bortoff; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cortical electrical stimulation alone enhances functional recovery and dendritic structures after focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

Authors:  Qin Zhou; Qian Zhang; Xueqing Zhao; Yanwen Y Duan; Yi Lu; Chengyan Li; Tao Li
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Robert Levy; Sean Ruland; Martin Weinand; David Lowry; Rima Dafer; Roy Bakay
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after stroke.

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Máximo Zimerman; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Inosine enhances recovery of grasp following cortical injury to the primary motor cortex of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Tara L Moore; Monica A Pessina; Seth P Finklestein; Ronald J Killiany; Bethany Bowley; Larry Benowitz; Douglas L Rosene
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Comparative Enhancement of Motor Function and BDNF Expression Following Different Brain Stimulation Approaches in an Animal Model of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Serena-Kaye Kinley-Cooper Sims; Aitana Rizzo; Kern Howard; Ariana Farrand; Heather Boger; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Preclinical Studies of Neuroplasticity Following Experimental Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Reorganization of Ventral Premotor Cortex After Ischemic Brain Injury: Effects of Forced Use.

Authors:  Shawn B Frost; Daofen Chen; Scott Barbay; Kathleen M Friel; Erik J Plautz; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.895

5.  Cerebellar Neuromodulation for Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Arbaz Momin; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 6.  Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Galit Pelled
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 7.  Regenerative Rehabilitation for Stroke Recovery by Inducing Synergistic Effects of Cell Therapy and Neurorehabilitation on Motor Function: A Narrative Review of Pre-Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Akira Ito; Naoko Kubo; Nan Liang; Tomoki Aoyama; Hiroshi Kuroki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Low-frequency cortical activity is a neuromodulatory target that tracks recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Dhakshin S Ramanathan; Ling Guo; Tanuj Gulati; Gray Davidson; April K Hishinuma; Seok-Joon Won; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang; Raymond A Swanson; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Rehabilitation combined with neural progenitor cell grafts enables functional recovery in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Paul Lu; Camila M Freria; Lori Graham; Amanda N Tran; Ashley Villarta; Dena Yassin; J Russell Huie; Adam R Ferguson; Mark H Tuszynski
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 10.  Understanding the Mechanisms of Recovery and/or Compensation following Injury.

Authors:  Michael J Hylin; Abigail L Kerr; Ryan Holden
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.