BACKGROUND: Cortical stimulation (CS) combined with rehabilitative training (RT) has proven effective for enhancing poststroke functional recovery in rats, but human clinical trials have had mixed outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of CS/RT versus RT in a nonhuman primate model of cortical ischemic stroke. METHODS: Squirrel monkeys learned a pellet retrieval task, then received an infarct to the distal forelimb (DFL) representation of primary motor cortex. A subdural monopolar electrode was implanted over the spared DFL representation in dorsal premotor cortex (PMD). Seven weeks postinfarct, monkeys underwent 4 to 6 weeks of RT (n = 8) or CS/RT (n = 7; 100 Hz, cathodal current) therapy. Behavioral performance was assessed before and after infarct, prior to therapy, and 1 and 12 weeks posttherapy (follow-up). The primary outcome measure was motor performance at 1 week posttherapy. Secondary outcomes included follow-up performance at 12 weeks and treatment-related changes in neurophysiological maps of spared DFL representations. RESULTS: While postinfarct performance deficits were found in all monkeys, both groups demonstrated similar recovery profiles, with no difference in motor recovery between the RT and CS/RT groups. Posttherapy, PMD DFL area was significantly expanded in the RT group but not the CS/RT group. A significant relationship was found between motor recovery and DFL expansion in premotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the specific parameters utilized here were not optimal for promoting behavioral recovery in nonhuman primates. Though CS/RT has consistently shown efficacy in rat stroke models, the present finding has cautionary implications for translation of CS/RT therapy to clinical populations.
BACKGROUND: Cortical stimulation (CS) combined with rehabilitative training (RT) has proven effective for enhancing poststroke functional recovery in rats, but human clinical trials have had mixed outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of CS/RT versus RT in a nonhuman primate model of cortical ischemic stroke. METHODS: Squirrel monkeys learned a pellet retrieval task, then received an infarct to the distal forelimb (DFL) representation of primary motor cortex. A subdural monopolar electrode was implanted over the spared DFL representation in dorsal premotor cortex (PMD). Seven weeks postinfarct, monkeys underwent 4 to 6 weeks of RT (n = 8) or CS/RT (n = 7; 100 Hz, cathodal current) therapy. Behavioral performance was assessed before and after infarct, prior to therapy, and 1 and 12 weeks posttherapy (follow-up). The primary outcome measure was motor performance at 1 week posttherapy. Secondary outcomes included follow-up performance at 12 weeks and treatment-related changes in neurophysiological maps of spared DFL representations. RESULTS: While postinfarct performance deficits were found in all monkeys, both groups demonstrated similar recovery profiles, with no difference in motor recovery between the RT and CS/RT groups. Posttherapy, PMDDFL area was significantly expanded in the RT group but not the CS/RT group. A significant relationship was found between motor recovery and DFL expansion in premotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the specific parameters utilized here were not optimal for promoting behavioral recovery in nonhuman primates. Though CS/RT has consistently shown efficacy in ratstroke models, the present finding has cautionary implications for translation of CS/RT therapy to clinical populations.
Authors: Amber J O'Bryant; DeAnna L Adkins; Austen A Sitko; Hannah L Combs; Sarah K Nordquist; Theresa A Jones Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Tara L Moore; Monica A Pessina; Seth P Finklestein; Ronald J Killiany; Bethany Bowley; Larry Benowitz; Douglas L Rosene Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Dhakshin S Ramanathan; Ling Guo; Tanuj Gulati; Gray Davidson; April K Hishinuma; Seok-Joon Won; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang; Raymond A Swanson; Karunesh Ganguly Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Paul Lu; Camila M Freria; Lori Graham; Amanda N Tran; Ashley Villarta; Dena Yassin; J Russell Huie; Adam R Ferguson; Mark H Tuszynski Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-08-22