| Literature DB >> 26704070 |
Bisrat Zeleke Shiferaw1, Bosena Tebeje Gashaw2, Fekadu Yadassa Tesso3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancy poses a major health problem on female students in higher educations. One of the key interventions to reduce unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion as outlined in the national youth strategy is making emergency contraception (EC) available for these risky population. However, despite its availability in many countries, EC has failed to have the desired impact on unintended pregnancy rates and its utilization is limited in colleges and universities. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with utilization of emergency contraception among female students in Mizan-Tepi University (MTU), south west Ethiopia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26704070 PMCID: PMC4691018 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1812-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Socio-demographic characteristics of female students, Mizan-Tepi University, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014 (n = 489)
| Variables | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age category | ||
| 15–19 | 154 | 31.5 |
| 20–24 | 323 | 66.1 |
| 25–29 | 9 | 1.8 |
| ≥30 | 3 | 0.6 |
| Year of study | ||
| First year | 134 | 27.4 |
| Second year | 126 | 25.8 |
| Third year | 169 | 34.6 |
| Fourth year | 52 | 10.6 |
| Fifth year | 8 | 1.6 |
| Field of study | ||
| None health sciences | 431 | 88.1 |
| Health sciences | 58 | 11.9 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 448 | 91.6 |
| Married | 38 | 7.8 |
| Divorced | 3 | 0.6 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 250 | 51.2 |
| Protestant | 141 | 28.8 |
| Muslim | 67 | 13.7 |
| Catholic | 21 | 4.3 |
| Othersa | 10 | 2.0 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Amhara | 193 | 39.5 |
| Oromo | 174 | 35.6 |
| Tigrie | 46 | 9.4 |
| Wolita | 29 | 5.9 |
| Gurage | 25 | 5.1 |
| Othersb | 22 | 4.5 |
aOther ethnic group refers to Keffa, Dawro, Silte, Sidama and Bench
bOther religious group refers to Adventist and Jehovah
Sexual and reproductive history of female students, Mizan-Tepi University, South west Ethiopia, March, 2014
| Variables | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Ever had sex since in the campus (n = 489) | ||
| Yes | 188 | 38.4 |
| No | 301 | 61.6 |
| Age at first sex (n = 188) | ||
| 15–19 | 122 | 64.8 |
| ≥20 | 66 | 35.1 |
| Unprotected sexa (n = 188) | ||
| Yes | 123 | 65.4 |
| No | 65 | 34.6 |
| History of pregnancy (n = 188) | ||
| Yes | 81 | 43.1 |
| No | 107 | 56.9 |
| Unintended pregnancy (n = 81) | ||
| Yes | 69 | 85.2 |
| No | 12 | 14.8 |
aUnprotected against pregnancy
Knowledge about emergency contraception among female students, Mizan-Tepi University, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014 (n = 332)
| Knowledge assessment items | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Where do you think emergency contraception could be obtained | ||
| Pharmacy/Health facility | 87 | 26.2 |
| Any shops | 143 | 43.1 |
| I don’t know | 102 | 30.7 |
| Which one of these drugs can be used for emergency contraception | ||
| Combined oral contraceptive | 98 | 29.5 |
| Progesterone only pills & IUCD | 90 | 27.1 |
| Anti-biotic like ampicillin | 34 | 10.2 |
| I don’t know | 110 | 33.2 |
| When taken early, emergency contraception prevent sexually transmitted infections | ||
| Yes | 158 | 47.5 |
| No | 51 | 15.4 |
| I don’t know | 123 | 37.1 |
| Situation(s) that emergency contraception should be taken | ||
| If condom ruptured during intercourse | 109 | 32.8 |
| When there is a missed pill | 78 | 23.4 |
| When forced to have sex/rape | 140 | 42.1 |
| When there is failure of contraception | 169 | 50.9 |
| I don’t know | 145 | 43.6 |
| The recommended maximum time limit to take emergency contraception pills | ||
| Within 24 h after sex | 120 | 36.1 |
| Within 72 h after sex | 94 | 28.3 |
| Within 5 days after sex | 42 | 12.7 |
| I don’t know | 76 | 22.9 |
| Effectiveness of emergency contraception pills in preventing pregnancy | ||
| Highly effective (>95 %) | 52 | 15.7 |
| Effective (75–89 %) | 68 | 20.5 |
| Less effective (<10 %) | 29 | 8.7 |
| Not effective at all | 40 | 12.0 |
| I don’t know | 143 | 43.1 |
| Recommended number of dose of emergency contraception pills | ||
| One dose | 50 | 15.1 |
| Two doses | 54 | 16.3 |
| Three doses | 35 | 10.5 |
| I don’t know | 193 | 58.1 |
| Recommended time between the doses of emergency contraception pills | ||
| Twelve hours apart | 49 | 14.8 |
| Twenty-four hours apart | 45 | 13.5 |
| Seventy-two hours apart | 50 | 15.1 |
| I don’t know | 188 | 56.6 |
| Knowledge of EC (Summary index) | ||
| Good knowledge | 80 | 24.1 |
| Poor knowledge | 252 | 75.9 |
Attitude towards emergency contraception among female students, Mizan-Tepi University, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014 (n = 489)
| Attitude assessment items | Disagree | Not sure | Agree | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | No | % | No | % | |
| Provision of Emergency contraception after an episode of un-protected sex can prevent unwanted pregnancy | 131 | 26.8 | 282 | 57.7 | 76 | 15.5 |
| All females have the right to access emergency contraception | 96 | 19.6 | 161 | 33.0 | 232 | 47.4 |
| Emergency contraception promotes promiscuity | 255 | 52.1 | 86 | 17.6 | 148 | 30.3 |
| Emergency contraception may hurt the baby in case it does not work | 72 | 14.7 | 164 | 33.6 | 253 | 51.7 |
| Emergency contraception is one way of abortion | 106 | 21.7 | 242 | 49.5 | 141 | 28.8 |
| It is sinful act to use emergency contraception | 84 | 17.2 | 273 | 55.9 | 132 | 26.9 |
| Emergency contraception use may cause infertility in a woman | 135 | 27.6 | 108 | 22.1 | 246 | 50.3 |
| Emergency contraception will affect ongoing regular methods of contraception negatively | 101 | 20.7 | 226 | 46.2 | 162 | 33.1 |
Emergency contraception utilization among female students of Mizan-Tepi University, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014
| Variables | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Used EC among those who had sex since in the campus (n = 188) | ||
| Yes | 68 | 36.2 |
| No | 120 | 63.8 |
| Used EC among those who had unprotected sex (n = 123) | ||
| Yes | 57 | 46.3 |
| No | 66 | 53.7 |
| Types of EC used (n = 68) | ||
| ECPs | 66 | 97.1 |
| IUCD | 2 | 2.9 |
| Source of information (n = 68)a | ||
| Female friends | 36 | 52.9 |
| Sexual partner | 30 | 44.1 |
| Mass media | 12 | 17.6 |
| Health professional/facility | 10 | 14.7 |
| Web pages | 7 | 10.2 |
| Other sources | 4 | 4.4 |
aIndicates that multiple response is possible for that item
Fig. 1Reasons for non-users of emergency contraception, among female students with unprotected sex, Mizan-Tepi university, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014 (n = 66)
Predictors of emergency contraception utilization among female students, Mizan-Tepi University, south west Ethiopia, March, 2014 (n = 188)
| Variables | Used EC | Odds Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | COR (95 % CI) | AOR (95 % CI) | |
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
| Age | ||||
| ≥20 years | 45 (66.2 %) | 61 (50.8 %) | 1.89 (1.02, 3.50) | 2.12 (.45, 9.98) |
| 15–19 years | 23 (33.8 %) | 59 (49.2 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Year of study | ||||
| Year II and above | 54 (79.4 %) | 77 (64.2 %) | 2.15 (1.07, 4.32) | .60 (.13, 2.79) |
| Year I | 14 (20.6 %) | 43 (35.8 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Field of study | ||||
| Health sciences | 21 (30.9 %) | 25 (20.8 %) | 1.69 (.86, 3.34) | .52 (.18, 1.48) |
| None Health sciences | 47 (69.1 %) | 95 (79.2 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Ever married | 22 (32.4 %) | 10 (8.3 %) | 5.26 (2.31,11.98) | 2.90 (.95, 8.78) |
| Singles | 46 (67.6 %) | 110 (91.7 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Age at first sexual intercourse | ||||
| ≥20 years | 43 (63.2 %) | 23 (19.2 %) | 7.25 (3.71,14.18) | 4.04 (1.72, 9.52) * |
| 15–19 years | 25 (36.8 %) | 97(80.8 %) | 1 | 1 |
| History of pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 47 (69.1 %) | 34 (28.3 %) | 5.66 (2.95,10.84) | 3.12 (1.34, 7.24)* |
| No | 21 (30.9 %) | 86 (71.7 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Ever use regular contraceptives | ||||
| Yes | 46 (67.6 %) | 31 (25.8 %) | 6.00 (3.12,11.52) | 5.01 (2.23,11.27)** |
| No | 22 (32.4 %) | 89 (74.2 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Knowledge on EC | ||||
| Good knowledge | 53 (77.9 %) | 29 (24.2 %) | 11.08 (5.45,22.53) | 3.24 (1.32, 7.98)* |
| Poor knowledge | 15 (22.1 %) | 91 (75.8 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Attitude towards EC | ||||
| Favorable attitude | 51 (75.0 %) | 70 (58.3 %) | 2.14 (1.11,4.13) | 1.95 (.80, 4.75) |
| Un Favorable attitude | 17 (25.0 %) | 50 (41.7 %) | 1 | 1 |
* P value of <0.05 and ** P value of <0.001