Literature DB >> 26703782

Thermal Energy during Irreversible Electroporation and the Influence of Different Ablation Parameters.

Willemien van den Bos1, Hester J Scheffer2, Jantien A Vogel3, Peter G K Wagstaff4, Daniel M de Bruin5, Marcus C de Jong2, Martin J C van Gemert6, Jean J M C H de la Rosette4, Martijn R Meijerink2, John H Klaessens7, Rudolf M Verdaasdonk7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) uses high-voltage electric fields to achieve cell death. Although the mechanism of IRE is mainly designated as nonthermal, development of secondary Joule heating is inevitable. The study purpose was to gain understanding of temperature development and distribution during IRE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRE was performed in a transparent polyacrylamide gel resembling soft tissue. Mechanical effects, changes in temperature gradient, and absolute temperature changes were measured with three different optical techniques (high-speed, color Schlieren, and infrared imaging) to investigate the effect on temperature of variations in voltage, pulse length, active tip length (ATL), interelectrode distance, electrode configuration (parallel, convergent, and divergent), and sequential pulsing (pulse delivery interrupted by breaks). The total delivered energy was calculated.
RESULTS: A temperature gradient, starting at the tips of both electrodes and expanding toward each other, developed immediately with pulse delivery. Temperatures increased with increasing voltage (by 2.5°C-40.4°C), pulse length (by 5.3°C-9.8°C), ATL (by 5.9°C-17.6°C), and interelectrode distance (by 7.6°C-21.5°C), in accordance with higher energy delivery. Nonparallel electrode placement resulted in heterogeneous temperature distribution with the peak temperature focused in the area with the shortest interelectrode distance. Sequential pulse delivery significantly reduced the temperature increase compared with continuous pulsing (4.3°C vs 11.7°C).
CONCLUSIONS: Voltage, pulse length, interelectrode distance, ATL, and electrode configuration each have a strong effect on temperature development and distribution during IRE. Sequential pulsing reduces the extent and volume of thermal distribution and may prove beneficial with respect to procedural safety.
Copyright © 2016 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703782     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  24 in total

1.  Impact on genitourinary function and quality of life following focal irreversible electroporation of different prostate segments.

Authors:  Matthijs J Scheltema; John I Chang; Willemien van den Bos; Ilan Gielchinsky; Tuan V Nguyen; Theo de M Reijke; Amila R Siriwardana; Maret Böhm; Jean J de la Rosette; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Irreversible electroporation for hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-06

3.  Successful ablation of lymph nodes using irreversible electroporation (IRE) in a porcine survival model.

Authors:  Stefan Fritz; Christof M Sommer; Thomas Longerich; Clemens Kuhn-Neureuther; Boris Radeleff; Jens Werner; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Evaluation of a robotic system for irreversible electroporation (IRE) of malignant liver tumors: initial results.

Authors:  L P Beyer; B Pregler; K Michalik; C Niessen; M Dollinger; M Müller; H J Schlitt; C Stroszczynski; P Wiggermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  [Focal therapy of prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Ganzer; T Franiel; J Köllermann; T Kuru; D Baumunk; A Blana; B Hadaschik; J von Hardenberg; T Henkel; K-U Köhrmann; U-B Liehr; S Machtens; A Roosen; G Salomon; H-P Schlemmer; L Sentker; J Wendler; U Witzsch; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Interventional therapy in malignant conditions of the prostate.

Authors:  Attila Kovács; Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Normal Porcine Ureter Retains Lumen Wall Integrity but Not Patency Following Catheter-Directed Irreversible Electroporation: Imaging and Histologic Assessment over 28 Days.

Authors:  Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Francois Cornelis; Thomas Wimmer; Sebastien Monette; Simon Y Kimm; Majid Maybody; Stephen B Solomon; Jonathan A Coleman; Jeremy C Durack
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Multi-Tissue Analysis on the Impact of Electroporation on Electrical and Thermal Properties.

Authors:  Natalie Beitel-White; Melvin F Lorenzo; Yajun Zhao; Rebecca M Brock; Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott; Irving C Allen; Navid Manuchehrabadi; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Development of a thermal model for irreversible electroporation: an approach to estimate and optimize the IRE protocols.

Authors:  Girindra Wardhana; João Pedro Almeida; Momen Abayazid; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.421

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.