| Literature DB >> 26703567 |
Qing You1, Yan Zhang2, Huan Wang3, Hongfu Fan4, Jianping Guo5, Ming Li6.
Abstract
Wormlike micelles are typically formed by mixing cationic and anionic surfactants because of attractive interactions in oppositely charged head-groups. The structural transitions of wormlike micelles triggered by pH in ionic liquids composed of N-alkyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bromide-based ILs (ionic liquids) and anthranilic acid were investigated. These structures were found responsible for the variations in flow properties identified by rheology and dynamic light scattering, and account for the structures observed with cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM). High-viscosity, shear-thinning behavior, and Maxwell-type dynamic rheology shown by the system at certain pH values suggested that spherical micelles grow into entangled wormlike micelles. Light scattering profiles also supported the notion of pH-sensitive microstructural transitions in the solution. Cryo-TEM images confirmed the presence of spherical micelles in the low-viscosity sample and entangled wormlike micelles in the peak viscosity sample. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis revealed that the pH sensitivity of ionic liquid systems originated from the pH-dependent binding ability of anthranilic acid to the cationic headgroup of ionic liquids.Entities:
Keywords: formation mechanism; morphological variation; pH-sensitive; rheology; wormlike micelles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26703567 PMCID: PMC4691043 DOI: 10.3390/ijms161226096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Steady shear viscosity versus shear rate γ (with a dot over the symbol) plots for 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solutions with different pH values.
Figure 2Variations of zero-shear viscosity (η0) as a function of 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution with different pH values.
Figure 3The relationship of G′ and G″ versus oscillation frequency ω for 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution with different pH values.
Figure 4The variation of G″ as a function of G′ of 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution with different pH values.
Figure 5Size distribution of 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution with different pH values.
Figure 6Cryo-TEM micrographs of nanostructured fluid based on 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution at different pH conditions.
Figure 7The 1H-NMR spectrum of 80 mM AA in the presence and absence of 80 mM C16MPBr at different pH values.
Figure 8Total chemical shifts of characteristic 1H-NMR signals measured at various pH values.
Figure 9Switchable viscosity of 80 mM C16MPBr-AA aqueous solution at different pH values.
Figure 10The molecular structure of N-hexadecyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bromide (C16MPBr) (a) and anthranilic acid (AA) (b).