| Literature DB >> 26703532 |
Pei-Ying Li1,2, Cheng-Chin Hsu3, Mei-Chin Yin4, Yueh-Hsiung Kuo5,6, Feng-Yao Tang7, Che-Yi Chao8,9.
Abstract
Diabetes is an important chronic disease and the 4th leading cause of death in Taiwan. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative and inflammatory damage are the main causes of chronic complications in diabetic patients. The red guava (red-fleshed guava cultivar of Psidium guajava L.) is a tropical fruit belonging to the Myrtaceae family and an important commercial crop in Taiwan. In this study, the protective effects of a diet containing red guava on inflammation and oxidative stress in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice were examined. The experimental group was divided into seven subgroups: normal (N), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes + red guava 1% (L), 2% (M), and 5% (H), diabetes + 5% red guava + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (HR), and diabetes + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (R). The mice were fed for 8 weeks and sacrificed by decapitation. Compared with the DM group, the experimental groups with diets containing red guava as well as rosiglitazone all showed significant improvements in blood glucose control, insulin resistance, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, cholesterol, c-reactive protein, TNF-α, and IL-10. Furthermore, the expression of inflammatory proteins, such as iNOS and NF-κB, was suppressed via activated PPARγ, and the expression levels of GPx3 and ACO increased. In summary, red guava can significantly suppress inflammatory and oxidative damage caused by diabetes and alleviate diabetic symptoms; thus, it exerts protective effects and has potential applications for the development of a dietary supplement.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammation; diabetes; oxidative stress; red guava
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26703532 PMCID: PMC6331796 DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Influence of red guava on blood glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance.
| N | DM | L | M | H | HR | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 129.06 ± 8.41 a | 234.21 ± 62.94 b | 174.03 ± 24.97 a | 132.69 ± 19.52 a | 141.51 ± 24.33 a | 141.61 ± 25.18 a | 135.83 ± 25.2 a |
| Insulin (μg/L) | 2.13 ± 0.7 a | 4.61 ± 1.44 b | 2.8 ± 0.46 a | 2.33 ± 0.7 a | 2.81 ± 0.34 a | 2.75 ± 0.69 a | 2.36 ± 0.83 a |
| HOMA-IR | 0.68 | 2.71 | 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
Results are mean ± SD of each group. Statistically significant differences are indicated by the symbols. Values not sharing letters in the same horizontal column differ significantly from one another by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05) among seven groups. The treatments were as follows: normal (N), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes + red guava 1% (L), 2% (M), and 5% (H), diabetes + 5% red guava + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (HR), and diabetes + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (R).
Influence of red guava on creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN).
| N | DM | L | M | H | HR | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.49 ± 0.02 b | 0.69 ± 0.04 c | 0.46 ± 0.03 a,b | 0.43 ± 0.03 a,b | 0.38 ± 0.03 a | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 0.52 ± 0.03 b |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.30 ± 3.35 a | 54.70 ± 2.74 c | 40.06 ± 2.62 b | 37.58 ± 3.13 b | 36.09 ± 4.64 b | 46.66 ± 1.77 b,c | 45.54 ± 4.42 b,c |
Results are mean ± SD of each group. Statistically significant differences are indicated by the symbols. Values not sharing letters in the same horizontal column differ significantly from one another by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05) among seven groups. The treatments were as is in Table 1.
Influence of red guava on triglycerides, cholesterol, and non-esterified free fatty acids.
| N | DM | L | M | H | HR | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.54 ± 0.03 c | 2.45 ± 0.08 d | 1.34 ± 0.02 a,b | 1.31 ± 0.02 a,b | 1.41 ± 0.03 a,b,c | 1.28 ± 0.02 a | 1.44 ± 0.04 b,c |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 140.74 ± 1.28 a | 152.85 ± 2.58 b | 139.12 ± 2 a | 135.97 ± 0.91 a | 137.4 ± 1.7 a | 138.25 ± 1.41 a | 140.78 ± 2.36 a |
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 1.56 ± 0.03 c | 2.05 ± 0.06 d | 1.37 ± 0.04 ab | 1.43 ± 0.02 b,c | 1.47 ± 0.03 b,c | 1.26 ± 0.04 a | 1.45 ± 0.04 b,c |
Results are mean ± SD of each group. Statistically significant differences are indicated by the symbols. Values not sharing letters in the same horizontal column differ significantly from one another by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05) among seven groups. The treatments were as in Table 1.
Influence of red guava on C-RP, TNF-α, and IL-10.
| N | DM | L | M | H | HR | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-RP (ng/mL) | 53.77 ± 0.36 b | 59.98 ± 1.44 c | 54.49 ± 1.91 b | 53.87 ± 1.39 b | 47.87 ± 1.48 a | 55.95 ± 0.68 a,b | 57.52 ± 1.11 a,b |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 133.86 ± 6.87 a | 303.4 ± 36.95 c | 264.33 ± 3.18 b,c | 232.33 ± 6.96 b | 250.67 ± 13.86 b,c | 263.33 ± 18.76 b,c | 204.67 ± 15.76 b |
| IL-10 (pg/mL) | 243.18 ± 19.6 b | 150.27 ± 8.3 a | 216.6 ± 19.38 b | 214.98 ± 20.29 b | 206.64 ± 18.69 a,b | 191.31 ± 28.64 a,b | 248.68 ± 25.04 b |
Results are mean ± SD of each group. Statistically significant differences are indicated by the symbols. Values not sharing letters in the same horizontal column differ significantly from one another by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05) among seven groups. The treatments were as in Table 1.
Figure 1Influence of red guava on ACO and GPx3 protein expression in mouse livers. The treatments were as follows: normal (N), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes + red guava 1% (L), 2% (M), and 5% (H), diabetes + 5% red guava + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (HR), and diabetes + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (R). Values are expressed as mean ± SD of each group. The lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Influence of red guava on iNOS and NF-κB inflammatory protein expression in mouse livers. The treatments were as follows: normal (N), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes + red guava 1% (L), 2% (M), and 5% (H), diabetes + 5% red guava + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (HR), and diabetes + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (R). Values are expressed as mean ± SD of each group. The lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Influence of red guava on PPARγ protein and mRNA expression in the mouse epididymal fat. The treatments were as follows: normal (N), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes + red guava 1% (L), 2% (M), and 5% (H), diabetes + 5% red guava + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (HR), and diabetes + anti-diabetic rosiglitazone (R). Values are expressed as mean ± SD of each group. The lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Experimental sample of red guava.