Literature DB >> 26703374

Differences in pedalling technique between road cyclists of different competitive levels.

Juan García-López1,2, Sergio Díez-Leal1, Ana Ogueta-Alday1, Josu Larrazabal2, José A Rodríguez-Marroyo1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the pedalling technique in road cyclists of different competitive levels. Eleven professional, thirteen elite and fourteen club cyclists were assessed at the beginning of their competition season. Cyclists' anthropometric characteristics and bike measurements were recorded. Three sets of pedalling (200, 250 and 300 W) on a cycle ergometer that simulated their habitual cycling posture were performed at a constant cadence (~90 rpm), while kinetic and kinematic variables were registered. The results showed no differences on the main anthropometric variables and bike measurements. Professional cyclists obtained higher positive impulse proportion (1.5-3.3% and P < 0.05), mainly due to a lower resistive torque during the upstroke (15.4-28.7% and P < 0.05). They also showed a higher ankle range of movement (ROM, 1.1-4.0° and P < 0.05). Significant correlations (P < 0.05) were found between the cyclists' body mass and the kinetic variables of pedalling: positive impulse proportion (r = -0.59 to -0.61), minimum (r = -0.59 to -0.63) and maximum torques (r = 0.35-0.47). In conclusion, professional cyclists had better pedalling technique than elite and club cyclists, because they opted for enhancing pulling force at the recovery phase to sustain the same power output. This technique depended on cycling experience and level of expertise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cycling; biomechanics; crank kinetics; joint kinematics; performance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703374     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1127987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  4 in total

1.  Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap P1 Pedals Power Meter.

Authors:  Jesús G Pallarés; José Ramón Lillo-Bevia
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Anthropometrics, flexibility and training history as determinants for bicycle configuration.

Authors:  Wendy Holliday; Jeroen Swart
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-04

3.  Changes in the Trunk and Lower Extremity Kinematics Due to Fatigue Can Predispose to Chronic Injuries in Cycling.

Authors:  Alberto Galindo-Martínez; Alejandro López-Valenciano; Carlos Albaladejo-García; Juan M Vallés-González; Jose L L Elvira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Caveats and Recommendations to Assess the Validity and Reliability of Cycling Power Meters: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anthony Bouillod; Georges Soto-Romero; Frederic Grappe; William Bertucci; Emmanuel Brunet; Johan Cassirame
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.