Literature DB >> 26703297

Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus.

Shyam Sunder Tummanapalli1, Haresh Potluri2, Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli2, Virender S Sangwan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps obtained using the Orbscan IIz scanning-slit device to distinguish differences in eyes with subclinical keratoconus from normal eyes.
SETTING: LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Axial and tangential maps of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were obtained in eyes of patients with subclinical keratoconus (normal fellow eye of an eye with clinically diagnosed keratoconus). The following measurements were obtained from each map and compared between the 2 groups: location of the corneal apex in millimeters relative to the corneal vertex, dioptric power at the corneal apex and corneal vertex, corneal irregularity indices at 3.0 mm and 5.0 mm, anterior-posterior apex ratio, and inferior-superior dioptric asymmetry value.
RESULTS: Maps were obtained in 71 eyes (71 patients) with subclinical keratoconus and 76 normal eyes (76 patients). The tangential posterior apex curvature was significantly steeper than the axial posterior apex curvature in both groups (P < .001). The anterior-posterior apex ratio on the tangential map demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.992 (cutoff ≥-6.97, sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 98.7%) followed by the posterior irregularity index in the 5.0 mm zone with an area under the ROC curve of 0.938 (cutoff ≥0.4, sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 84.2%) in differentiating subclinical keratoconus eyes from normal eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The anterior-posterior apex ratio on the tangential map and 5.0 mm irregularity index of the posterior corneal surface were highly sensitive and specific for early detection of subclinical keratoconus. Tangential corneal topography maps should be considered in preoperative subclinical keratoconus screening. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703297     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuemin Zhang; Saleha Z Munir; Syed A Sami Karim; Wuqaas M Munir
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Involvement of anterior and posterior corneal surface area imbalance in the pathological change of keratoconus.

Authors:  Koji Kitazawa; Motohiro Itoi; Isao Yokota; Koichi Wakimasu; Yuko Cho; Yo Nakamura; Osamu Hieda; Shigeru Kinoshita; Chie Sotozono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results.

Authors:  Adel Galal Zaky; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah; Abdelrahman Elsebaey Sarhan; Moataz Faiz Elsawy
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Topography and Higher Order Corneal Aberrations of the Fellow Eye in Unilateral Keratoconus.

Authors:  Sibel Aksoy; Sezen Akkaya; Yelda Özkurt; Sevda Kurna; Banu Açıkalın; Tomris Şengör
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.