Literature DB >> 26701735

What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women.

S Downe1, K Finlayson1, Ӧ Tunçalp2, A Metin Gülmezoglu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global uptake of antenatal care (ANC) varies widely and is influenced by the value women place on the service they receive. Identifying outcomes that matter to pregnant women could inform service design and improve uptake and effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic scoping review of what women want, need and value in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eight databases were searched (1994-2015) with no language restriction. Relevant journal contents were tracked via Zetoc. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: An initial analytic framework was constructed with findings from 21 papers, using data-mining techniques, and then developed using meta-ethnographic approaches. The final framework was tested with 17 more papers. MAIN
RESULTS: All continents except Australia were represented. A total of 1264 women were included. The final meta-theme was: Women want and need a positive pregnancy experience, including four subthemes: maintaining physical and sociocultural normality; maintaining a healthy pregnancy for mother and baby (including preventing and treating risks, illness and death); effective transition to positive labour and birth; and achieving positive motherhood (including maternal self-esteem, competence, autonomy). Findings informed a framework for future ANC provision, comprising three equally important domains: clinical practices (interventions and tests); relevant and timely information; and pyschosocial and emotional support; each provided by practitioners with good clinical and interpersonal skills within a high quality health system.
CONCLUSIONS: A positive pregnancy experience matters across all cultural and sociodemographic contexts. ANC guidelines and services should be designed to deliver it, and those providing ANC services should be aware of it at each encounter with pregnant women. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women around the world want ANC staff and services to help them achieve a positive pregnancy experience.
© 2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal care; World Health Organization; guidelines; pregnancy; social support; women's views; wordclouds

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26701735     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  60 in total

Review 1.  Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Susan Munabi-Babigumira; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Atle Fretheim; Harriet Nabudere
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 2.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Kenneth Finlayson; Özge Tunçalp; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

4.  Transforming women's and providers' experience of care for improved outcomes: A theory of change for group antenatal care in Kenya and Nigeria.

Authors:  Lindsay Grenier; Brenda Onguti; Lillian J Whiting-Collins; Eunice Omanga; Stephanie Suhowatsky; Peter J Winch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries.

Authors:  Ghada Saad-Haddad; Jocelyn DeJong; Nancy Terreri; María Clara Restrepo-Méndez; Jamie Perin; Lara Vaz; Holly Newby; Agbessi Amouzou; Aluísio Jd Barros; Jennifer Bryce
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.413

6.  Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making.

Authors:  Etienne V Langlois; Özge Tunçalp; Susan L Norris; Ian Askew; Abdul Ghaffar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  The timing of antenatal care initiation and the content of care in Sindh, Pakistan.

Authors:  Sohail Agha; Hannah Tappis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Expanding the evidence base for global recommendations on health systems: strengths and challenges of the OptimizeMNH guidance process.

Authors:  Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence.

Authors:  Christopher J Colvin; Ruth Garside; Megan Wainwright; Heather Munthe-Kaas; Claire Glenton; Meghan A Bohren; Benedicte Carlsen; Özge Tunçalp; Jane Noyes; Andrew Booth; Arash Rashidian; Signe Flottorp; Simon Lewin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table.

Authors:  Simon Lewin; Meghan Bohren; Arash Rashidian; Heather Munthe-Kaas; Claire Glenton; Christopher J Colvin; Ruth Garside; Jane Noyes; Andrew Booth; Özge Tunçalp; Megan Wainwright; Signe Flottorp; Joseph D Tucker; Benedicte Carlsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.