Literature DB >> 26701269

Idiopathic Dacryoadenitis: Clinical Features, Histopathology, and Treatment Outcomes.

Nicholas H Andrew1, Daniel Kearney2, Nicole Sladden2, Penny McKelvie3, Albert Wu4, Michelle T Sun4, Alan McNab3, Dinesh Selva4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the clinical and histologic features of idiopathic dacryoadenitis, and to assess prognostic factors associated with disease recurrence, treatment recalcitrance, and incomplete treatment response.
DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series.
METHODS: setting: Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Seventy-nine cases of biopsy-confirmed idiopathic dacryoadenitis. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: The following data were reviewed: age, sex, laterality, symptom onset, clinical presentation, histopathology, treatment response, and recurrence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of treatment recalcitrance, incomplete treatment response, and recurrence.
RESULTS: Idiopathic dacryoadenitis patients had a mean age of 50 years, 57% were female, and 16% of cases were bilateral. Fifty-two percent had inflammation extending to adjacent structures on imaging. Twenty percent were recalcitrant to treatment, 17% had an incomplete treatment response, and 15% of patients had a recurrence during a mean follow-up time of 64 months. Risk factors for an incomplete treatment response were male sex (P = .01) and inflammation extending to extraocular muscle (P = .01). A clinical presentation of "classic" dacryoadenitis was a risk factor for treatment recalcitrance (P = .02). Bilateral cases were younger than unilateral cases (P = .004) and had an increased risk of recurrence (P = .05). Sclerosing cases were associated with an insidious onset of symptoms (P = .009), but neither histopathology nor the speed of symptom onset was associated with a poor prognosis.
CONCLUSION: Thirty-seven percent of idiopathic dacryoadenitis had a poor response to treatment and 15% of cases recurred. The prognostic factors identified in this study have not been reported previously and may inform management.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26701269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria of Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation Using a Modified Delphi Approach.

Authors:  Ilse Mombaerts; Jurij R Bilyk; Geoffrey E Rose; Alan A McNab; Aaron Fay; Peter J Dolman; Richard C Allen; Martin H Devoto; Gerald J Harris
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Masses of the Lacrimal Gland: Evaluation and Treatment.

Authors:  Jane S Kim; Jason Liss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-18

3.  Clinical heterogeneity between two subgroups of patients with idiopathic orbital inflammation.

Authors:  Toshinobu Kubota; Akari Iwakoshi
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06

4.  Lacrimal gland tumors in Turkey: types, frequency, and outcomes.

Authors:  Yağmur Seda Yeşiltaş; Ahmet Kaan Gündüz; Esra Erden; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Gene Expression Profiling and Heterogeneity of Nonspecific Orbital Inflammation Affecting the Lacrimal Gland.

Authors:  James T Rosenbaum; Dongseok Choi; Christina A Harrington; David J Wilson; Hans E Grossniklaus; Cailin H Sibley; Sherveen S Salek; John D Ng; Roger A Dailey; Eric A Steele; Brent Hayek; Caroline M Craven; Deepak P Edward; Azza M Y Maktabi; Hailah Al Hussain; Valerie A White; Peter J Dolman; Craig N Czyz; Jill A Foster; Gerald J Harris; Youn-Shen Bee; David T Tse; Chrisfouad R Alabiad; Sander R Dubovy; Michael Kazim; Dinesh Selva; R Patrick Yeatts; Bobby S Korn; Don O Kikkawa; Rona Z Silkiss; Jennifer A Sivak-Callcott; Patrick Stauffer; Stephen R Planck
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 7.389

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.