Literature DB >> 26700758

Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors.

Xinhua Wang1, Yanxiao Zhao1, Bo Yuan1, Zhiwei Wang2, Xiufen Li3, Yueping Ren1.   

Abstract

There are two types of popular forward osmosis (FO) membrane materials applied for researches on FO process, cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin film composite (TFC) polyamide. However, performance and fouling mechanisms of commercial TFC FO membrane in osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBRs) are still unknown. In current study, its biofouling behaviors in OMBRs were investigated and further compared to the CTA FO membrane. The results indicated that β-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides and microorganisms accounted for approximately 77% of total biovolume on the CTA FO membrane while β-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides (biovolume ratio of 81.1%) were the only dominant biofoulants on the TFC FO membrane. The analyses on the biofouling structure implied that a tighter biofouling layer with a larger biovolume was formed on the CTA FO membrane. The differences in biofouling behaviors including biofoulants composition and biofouling structure between CTA and TFC FO membranes were attributed to different membrane surface properties.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofouling; Cellulose triacetate; Forward osmosis; Osmotic membrane bioreactor; Thin-film composite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26700758     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  6 in total

1.  Nanoparticle fouling and its combination with organic fouling during forward osmosis process for silver nanoparticles removal from simulated wastewater.

Authors:  Yanxiao Zhao; Xinhua Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Xiufen Li; Yueping Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Biofouling Mitigation by Chloramination during Forward Osmosis Filtration of Wastewater.

Authors:  Takahiro Fujioka; Kha H Nguyen; Anh Tram Hoang; Tetsuro Ueyama; Hidenari Yasui; Mitsuharu Terashima; Long D Nghiem
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Thin Film Biocomposite Membrane for Forward Osmosis Supported by Eggshell Membrane.

Authors:  Teayeop Kim; Sunho Park; Yoonkyung Lee; Jangho Kim; Kyunghoon Kim
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30

4.  Dopamine incorporating forward osmosis membranes with enhanced selectivity and antifouling properties.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Zhendong Fang; Shuaifei Zhao; Derrick Ng; Juan Zhang; Zongli Xie
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 5.  Strategies in Forward Osmosis Membrane Substrate Fabrication and Modification: A Review.

Authors:  Nur Diyana Suzaimi; Pei Sean Goh; Ahmad Fauzi Ismail; Stanley Chinedu Mamah; Nik Ahmad Nizam Nik Malek; Jun Wei Lim; Kar Chun Wong; Nidal Hilal
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 6.  Advancing Strategies of Biofouling Control in Water-Treated Polymeric Membranes.

Authors:  Hongli Zhang; Shilin Zhu; Jie Yang; Aijie Ma
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.