Joaquin Calatayud1,2, Jonas Vinstrup1, Markus Due Jakobsen1,3, Emil Sundstrup1,3, Mikkel Brandt1,4, Kenneth Jay1,3,2, Juan Carlos Colado2, Lars Louis Andersen5,6. 1. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Research unit in Sport and Health, Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 3. Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 4. Physical Activity and Human Performance Group, SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, Copenhagen, Denmark. lla@nrcwe.dk. 6. Physical Activity and Human Performance Group, SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. lla@nrcwe.dk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether focusing on using specific muscles during bench press can selectively activate these muscles. METHODS: Altogether 18 resistance-trained men participated. Subjects were familiarized with the procedure and performed one-maximum repetition (1RM) test during the first session. In the second session, 3 different bench press conditions were performed with intensities of 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 % of the pre-determined 1RM: regular bench press, and bench press focusing on selectively using the pectoralis major and triceps brachii, respectively. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded for the triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscles. Subsequently, peak EMG of the filtered signals were normalized to maximum maximorum EMG of each muscle. RESULTS: In both muscles, focusing on using the respective muscles increased muscle activity at relative loads between 20 and 60 %, but not at 80 % of 1RM. Overall, a threshold between 60 and 80 % rather than a linear decrease in selective activation with increasing intensity appeared to exist. The increased activity did not occur at the expense of decreased activity of the other muscle, e.g. when focusing on activating the triceps muscle the activity of the pectoralis muscle did not decrease. On the contrary, focusing on using the triceps muscle also increased pectoralis EMG at 50 and 60 % of 1RM. CONCLUSION: Resistance-trained individuals can increase triceps brachii or pectarilis major muscle activity during the bench press when focusing on using the specific muscle at intensities up to 60 % of 1RM. A threshold between 60 and 80 % appeared to exist.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates whether focusing on using specific muscles during bench press can selectively activate these muscles. METHODS: Altogether 18 resistance-trained men participated. Subjects were familiarized with the procedure and performed one-maximum repetition (1RM) test during the first session. In the second session, 3 different bench press conditions were performed with intensities of 20, 40, 50, 60 and 80 % of the pre-determined 1RM: regular bench press, and bench press focusing on selectively using the pectoralis major and triceps brachii, respectively. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded for the triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscles. Subsequently, peak EMG of the filtered signals were normalized to maximum maximorum EMG of each muscle. RESULTS: In both muscles, focusing on using the respective muscles increased muscle activity at relative loads between 20 and 60 %, but not at 80 % of 1RM. Overall, a threshold between 60 and 80 % rather than a linear decrease in selective activation with increasing intensity appeared to exist. The increased activity did not occur at the expense of decreased activity of the other muscle, e.g. when focusing on activating the triceps muscle the activity of the pectoralis muscle did not decrease. On the contrary, focusing on using the triceps muscle also increased pectoralis EMG at 50 and 60 % of 1RM. CONCLUSION: Resistance-trained individuals can increase triceps brachii or pectarilis major muscle activity during the bench press when focusing on using the specific muscle at intensities up to 60 % of 1RM. A threshold between 60 and 80 % appeared to exist.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bodybuilding; Internal focus; Muscle activation; Strength training
Authors: Markus Due Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Christoffer H Andersen; Per Aagaard; Lars L Andersen Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Joaquin Calatayud; Jonas Vinstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Juan Carlos Colado; Lars L Andersen Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Kasper Krommes; Thomas Bandholm; Markus D Jakobsen; Lars L Andersen; Andreas Serner; Per Hölmich; Kristian Thorborg Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2017-06
Authors: Petr Stastny; Artur Gołaś; Dusan Blazek; Adam Maszczyk; Michał Wilk; Przemysław Pietraszewski; Miroslav Petr; Petr Uhlir; Adam Zając Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giuseppe Coratella; Gianpaolo Tornatore; Stefano Longo; Fabio Esposito; Emiliano Cè Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joaquín Calatayud; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Carlos Cruz-Montecinos; Lars L Andersen; Sofía Pérez-Alenda; Ramón Aiguadé; José Casaña Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: David Rodríguez-Ridao; José A Antequera-Vique; Isabel Martín-Fuentes; José M Muyor Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.390