Literature DB >> 26700645

An examination of the disparity between self-identified versus legally identified rape victimization: A pilot study.

Dorothy F Marsil1, Corinne McNamara1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Researchers compared rape victimization based on self-identification to the current federal legal definition in a pilot study of college students.
METHODS: The sample was comprised of 1,648 (69.8% female; 30.2% male) college students who completed the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) online.
RESULTS: Based on the current legal definition of rape, 9.4% (11.1% female; 5.2% male) of students had been raped since being enrolled, but only 2.9% of students self-identified as being raped. Moreover, 15.1% of students reported ever being raped, with females acknowledging higher rates (19.7%) than males (4.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Rape continues to be a major issue for colleges and universities. A serious concern is the disparity between the number of those who met the behavioral criteria for rape victimization based on the current legal definition, but who did not self-identify as a victim. Universities must address this disparity by using multiple measures to assess the prevalence of sexual violence on campus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  College students; gender; rape; sexual assault

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26700645     DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1107838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Health        ISSN: 0744-8481


  2 in total

1.  The Role of Title IX Coordinators on College and University Campuses.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; James DiLoreto
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 2.  Big Boys Don't Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization.

Authors:  Joke Depraetere; Christophe Vandeviver; Tom Vander Beken; Ines Keygnaert
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2018-12-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.