Literature DB >> 26699908

Saw1 localizes to repair sites but is not required for recruitment of Rad10 to repair intermediates bearing short non-homologous 3' flaps during single-strand annealing in S. cerevisiae.

Melina Mardirosian1, Linette Nalbandyan1, Aaron D Miller1, Claire Phan1, Eric P Kelson1, Paula L Fischhaber2.   

Abstract

SAW1 is required for efficient removal by the Rad1-Rad10 nuclease of 3' non-homologous DNA ends (flaps) formed as intermediates during two modes of double-strand break (DSB) repair in S. cerevisiae, single-strand annealing (SSA) and synthesis-dependent strand annealing. Saw1 was shown in vitro to bind flaps with high affinity, but displayed diminished affinity when flaps were short (<30 deoxynucleotides [nt]), consistent with it not being required for short flap cleavage. Accordingly, this study, using in vivo fluorescence microscopy showed that SAW1 was not required for recruitment of Rad10-YFP to DNA DSBs during their repair by SSA when the flaps were ~10 nt. In contrast, recruitment of Rad10-YFP to DSBs when flaps were ~500 nt did require SAW1 in G1 phase of cell cycle. Interestingly, we observed a substantial increase in colocalization of Saw1-CFP and Rad10-YFP at DSBs when short flaps were formed during repair, especially in G1, indicating significant recruitment of Saw1 despite there being no requirement for Saw1 to recruit Rad10. Saw1-CFP was seldom observed at DSBs without Rad10-YFP. Together, these results support a model in which Saw1 and Rad1-Rad10 are recruited as a complex to short and long flaps in all phases of cell cycle, but that Saw1 is only required for recruitment of Rad1-Rad10 to DSBs when long flaps are formed in G1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-strand break repair; Rad10; Saw1; Single-strand annealing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26699908      PMCID: PMC4727451          DOI: 10.1007/s11010-015-2616-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0300-8177            Impact factor:   3.396


  26 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-02-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  SAW1 is required for SDSA double-strand break repair in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Graciel Diamante; Claire Phan; Angie S Celis; Jonas Krueger; Eric P Kelson; Paula L Fischhaber
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Anuja Mehta; James E Haber
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Rad51 ATP binding but not hydrolysis is required to recruit Rad10 in synthesis-dependent strand annealing sites in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Justin Karlin; Paula L Fischhaber
Journal:  Adv Biol Chem       Date:  2013-06

Review 7.  Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 paralogs in sister chromatid recombination.

Authors:  Amy M Mozlin; Cindy W Fung; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  RAD1 and RAD10, but not other excision repair genes, are required for double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E L Ivanov; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A versatile scaffold contributes to damage survival via sumoylation and nuclease interactions.

Authors:  Prabha Sarangi; Veronika Altmannova; Cory Holland; Zdenka Bartosova; Fanfan Hao; Dorothea Anrather; Gustav Ammerer; Sang Eun Lee; Lumir Krejci; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.