OBJECTIVES: To find out whether intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination is painless by comparing pain score of ultrasound-based versus digital vaginal examination of foetal head station. METHODS: In 94 women carrying uncomplicated-term singleton pregnancies, labour progress was assessed by translabial ultrasound, followed immediately by conventional digital vaginal examination. Pain scores (0-10) using visual analogue pain scale were obtained for both examinations. Forty-eight and forty-six sets of data were obtained in first and second stage of labour, respectively. The difference in pain scores between digital vaginal examination and translabial ultrasound was analysed. RESULTS: The median pain score for translabial ultrasound was 0 (range 0-8), while that for vaginal examination was 4.5 (range 0-10), p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in pain scores between first and second stages of labour for translabial ultrasound (p = 0.123) and for vaginal examination (p = 0.680). The pain score for vaginal examination was higher than that of translabial ultrasound in 81.9%, similar in 13.8% and lower in 4.3% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores obtained for digital vaginal examination by clinicians with different experience (p = 0.941). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound is generally better tolerated than digital vaginal examination for assessment of labour progress, making it an acceptable adjunctive assessment tool during labour.
OBJECTIVES: To find out whether intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination is painless by comparing pain score of ultrasound-based versus digital vaginal examination of foetal head station. METHODS: In 94 women carrying uncomplicated-term singleton pregnancies, labour progress was assessed by translabial ultrasound, followed immediately by conventional digital vaginal examination. Pain scores (0-10) using visual analogue pain scale were obtained for both examinations. Forty-eight and forty-six sets of data were obtained in first and second stage of labour, respectively. The difference in pain scores between digital vaginal examination and translabial ultrasound was analysed. RESULTS: The median pain score for translabial ultrasound was 0 (range 0-8), while that for vaginal examination was 4.5 (range 0-10), p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in pain scores between first and second stages of labour for translabial ultrasound (p = 0.123) and for vaginal examination (p = 0.680). The pain score for vaginal examination was higher than that of translabial ultrasound in 81.9%, similar in 13.8% and lower in 4.3% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores obtained for digital vaginal examination by clinicians with different experience (p = 0.941). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound is generally better tolerated than digital vaginal examination for assessment of labour progress, making it an acceptable adjunctive assessment tool during labour.