Literature DB >> 26698602

The National Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs): Scope, Causes, and Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice.

Rebecca Campbell1, Hannah Feeney1, Giannina Fehler-Cabral2, Jessica Shaw3, Sheena Horsford4.   

Abstract

Victims of sexual assault are often advised to have a medical forensic exam and sexual assault kit (SAK; also termed a "rape kit") to preserve physical evidence (e.g., semen, blood, and/or saliva samples) to aid in the investigation and prosecution of the crime. Law enforcement are tasked with submitting the rape kit to a forensic laboratory for DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) analysis, which can be instrumental in identifying offenders in previously unsolved crimes, confirming identify in known-offender assaults, discovering serial rapists, and exonerating individuals wrongly accused. However, a growing number of media stories, investigative advocacy projects, and social science studies indicate that police are not routinely submitting SAKs for forensic testing, and instead rape kits are placed in evidence storage, sometimes for decades. This review article examines the growing national problem of untested rape kits by summarizing current research on the number of untested SAKs in the United States and exploring the underlying reasons why police do not submit this evidence for DNA testing. Recommendations for future research that can guide policy and practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  offenders; reporting/disclosure; sexual assault

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26698602     DOI: 10.1177/1524838015622436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse        ISSN: 1524-8380


  3 in total

Review 1.  Race and the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jessica Shaw; HaeNim Lee
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2019-05-06

2.  The jurisdictional return on investment from processing the backlog of untested sexual assault kits.

Authors:  Paul J Speaker
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016-2019.

Authors:  William P McAndrew; Max M Houck
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.395

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.