Literature DB >> 26698027

Prognosis, Treatment Benefit and Goals of Care: What do Oncologists Discuss with Patients who have Incurable Cancer?

W Raskin1, I Harle2, W M Hopman3, C M Booth4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Documentation of advance directives among patients with terminal cancer is known to be poor. Here we describe documentation of prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care discussions in outpatients with advanced cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic pancreas or lung cancers during 2010-2013 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario were identified from electronic pharmacy records. Clinical notes from medical oncology were reviewed to identify documentation of discussions regarding prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care. Differences between groups were tested using the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: In total, 222 patients were included: 80% (177/222) with lung cancer and 20% (45/222) with pancreas cancer. Medical oncology notes documented discussion of prognosis in 64% (142/222), palliative intent of therapy in 82% (182/222), magnitude of treatment benefit in 29% (64/222) and goals of care in 4% (9/222) of patients. An estimate of survival was documented in 36% (79/222) of cases. Across medical oncology providers there was substantial variation in the frequency of discussing prognosis (range 33-90%, P < 0.001), treatment intent (range 55-100%, P < 0.001) and goals of care (range 0-17%, P = 0.034). In total, 41% (93/222) of patients were seen by palliative care; substantial medical oncology provider variation was observed (range 27-58%, P = 0.020). Referral rates to palliative care did not increase over time (41-44%, P = 0.250).
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of ambulatory patients with an estimated life expectancy of 1 year or less, medical oncology documentation of prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care was poor. Less than half the patients were seen by palliative care. Initiatives to improve documentation and referral to palliative care are needed.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; goals of care; patient preferences; prognosis; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26698027     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  6 in total

1.  Early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: evidence and overcoming barriers to implementation.

Authors:  D A Kain; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  The role of Dickkopf family in cancers: from Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  You-Cheng Shao; Yan Wei; Jin-Fang Liu; Xiao-Yan Xu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  The Stage IV Shuffle: Elusiveness of Straight Talk About Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Brand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  S L Douglas; B J Daly; N J Meropol; A R Lipson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  A prospective, randomized trial of patient-reported outcome measures to drive management decisions in hematology and oncology.

Authors:  Rahma Warsame; Joselle Cook; Briant Fruth; Joleen Hubbard; Katrina Croghan; Katharine A R Price; Aminah Jatoi; Shaji Kumar; Carrie Thompson; Jan Buckner; Angela Dispenzieri; Jeff Sloan; Amylou C Dueck
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  Toward improved goals-of-care documentation in advanced cancer: report on the development of a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  I Harle; S Karim; W Raskin; W M Hopman; C M Booth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.