Literature DB >> 26698007

Chemomechanical Excavation is More Time-consuming Than Rotary, but not Necessarily Hand Excavation.

Falk Schwendicke1.   

Abstract

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on chemomechanical caries removal. Hamama, H., et al.Oper Dent 2015;40(4):E167-178. REVIEWER: Falk Schwendicke, DDS, PhD PURPOSE/QUESTION: How valid were the methodologies of studies on chemomechnical caries removal, and is chemomechanical caries removal more time-consuming than conventional hand or rotary excavation? SOURCE OF FUNDING: Information not available TYPE OF STUDY/
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3: Other evidence STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION GRADE: Grade C (no patient-centered/relevant outcomes).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26698007     DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract        ISSN: 1532-3382            Impact factor:   5.267


  1 in total

1.  Treatment time, pain experience and acceptability of the technique for caries removal in primary teeth using the ART approach with or without Brix3000™ papain gel: a preliminary randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  T F de Souza; M L Martins; C M Tavares-Silva; A Fonseca-Gonçalves; L C Maia
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-10-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.