Literature DB >> 26697957

Barriers to genuine consumer and carer participation from the perspectives of Australian systemic mental health advocates.

Alison Gee1, Craig McGarty2, Michelle Banfield3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consumer and carer participation in mental health service development and evaluation has widespread nominal support. However, genuine and consistent participation remains elusive due to systemic barriers. AIMS: This paper explores barriers to reform for mental health services from the perspectives of consumers and carers actively engaged in advocating for improvements in the mental health system.
METHOD: Qualitative research with two mental health systemic advocacy organisations analysed 17 strategic communication documents and nine interviews to examine barriers to reform and participation identified by consumer and carer advocates and staff.
RESULTS: A number of individual-level barriers were described, however advocates gave more focus to systemic barriers, for which five themes emerged. These reflected lack of awareness, limited participation opportunities, slow progress for change, policy issues and mental health culture including stigma.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight systemic barriers to participation for consumer and carer advocates as a whole and the influence of these barriers on the individual experiences of those engaged in advocacy and representation work. Participants also emphasised the need for leadership to overcome some of these obstacles and move towards genuine consumer and carer participation and reform. Findings are discussed in the context of power within mental health systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advocacy; barriers; carer participation; consumer participation; user involvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26697957     DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  6 in total

1.  Involving carers in risk assessment: a study of a structured dialogue between mental health nurses and carers.

Authors:  Haley Jackson; Jane Wray; Eric Gardiner; Tracy Flanagan
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-08-08

2.  Consumers' understanding and expectations of a community-based recovery-oriented mental health rehabilitation unit: a pragmatic grounded theory analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Parker; Frances Dark; Ellie Newman; Dominic Hanley; William McKinlay; Carla Meurk
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  Issues for eHealth in Psychiatry: Results of an Expert Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer Nicholas; Kit Huckvale; Mark Erik Larsen; Ashna Basu; Philip J Batterham; Frances Shaw; Shahbaz Sendi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Authentic engagement: A conceptual model for welcoming diverse and challenging consumer and survivor views in mental health research, policy, and practice.

Authors:  Indigo Daya; Bridget Hamilton; Cath Roper
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.503

5.  Designing for the Co-Use of Consumer Health Technology in Self-Management of Adolescent Overweight and Obesity: Mixed Methods Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Cynthia M LeRouge; Hyeyoung Hah; Haoqiang Jiang; Gloria J Deckard
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Creating or taking opportunity: Strategies for implementing expert by experience positions in mental health academia.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Aine O Donovan; Terri Warner; Julie Sharrock; Sarah Gordon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 2.720

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.