Literature DB >> 26697381

Transcriptomic profile of aguR deletion mutant of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666.

Beatriz Del Rio1, Daniel M Linares1, Begoña Redruello1, Maria Cruz Martin1, Maria Fernandez1, Anne de Jong2, Oscar P Kuipers2, Victor Ladero1, Miguel A Alvarez1.   

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 (formerly GE2-14) is a dairy strain that catabolizes agmatine (a decarboxylated derivative of arginine) into the biogenic amine putrescine by the agmatine deiminase (AGDI) pathway [1]. The AGDI cluster of L. lactis is composed by five genes aguR, aguB, aguD, aguA and aguC. The last four genes are responsible for the deamination of agmatine to putrescine and are co-transcribed as a single policistronic mRNA forming the catabolic operon aguBDAC[1]. aguR encodes a transmembrane protein that functions as a one-component signal transduction system that senses the agmatine concentration of the medium and accordingly regulates the transcription of aguBDAC[2], which is also transcriptionally regulated by carbon catabolic repression (CCR) via glucose, but not by other sugars such as lactose and galactose [1], [3]. Here we report the transcriptional profiling of the aguR gene deletion mutant (L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 ∆aguR) [2] compared to the wild type strain, both grown in M17 medium with galactose as carbon source and supplemented with agmatine. The transcriptional profiling data of AguR-regulated genes were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession no. GSE59514.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agmatine deiminase cluster; AguR; Lactococcus lactis; Microarray; Putrescine

Year:  2015        PMID: 26697381      PMCID: PMC4664769          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

Microarray data are accessible in the following link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE59514.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Design of L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 DNA microarrays

L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 DNA microarrays (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) were designed using the Agilent eArray (v5.0) program according to the manufacturers' recommendations as described in Linares et al. (2015) [2]. Each microarray (8 × 15 K) was designed to contain spots of two different 60-mer oligonucleotide probes (in duplicate) specific for each of the 2635 coding DNA sequences (CDSs) representing the protein-coding genes of the L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 genome (GenBank accesion no. AZSI00000000.1) [4].

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Table 1 shows the strains used in this study. L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 was originally isolated from a traditional cheese [5]. The mutant strain L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 ∆ aguR was constructed by homologous recombination [2]. Both strains were grown in replicates (10 ml each) in M17 medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) supplemented with 1% galactose (w/v) and 20 mM agmatine (Sigma-Aldrich, Barcelona, Spain) for 6 h at 30 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were removed and cell pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C.
Table 1

Strains used in this study.

StrainDescriptionReference/source
L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666aPutrescine producer[3], CECTb
L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 ∆aguRNon-putrescine producer[5]

Formerly L. lactis subsp. cremoris GE2-14.

CECT: Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo.

RNA extraction

RNA extraction was performed as previously described [6] with minor modifications. Briefly, cell pellets were thaw on ice and resuspended in 500 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) and transferred to screw-capped tubes containing 50 μl of 10% SDS, 500 μl of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma-Aldrich), 500 mg of glass beads (75–150 μm) (Sigma-Aldrich), and 175 μl of Macaloid suspension (Bentone MA, Rheox Inc., Scotland, United Kingdom). Cells were mechanically disrupted in a bead beater at 4 °C. The samples were shaken two times for 45 s. During the shaking intervals the cells were kept on ice for 1 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 8000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The upper phase was transferred to fresh tubes containing 500 μl chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C. 500 μl of the upper phase was transferred to fresh tubes containing 1 ml of lysis/binding buffer of the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). All subsequent steps including the DNaseI treatment were performed following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The concentration and quality of the RNA were checked on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Landsmeer, The Netherlands).

Synthesis of cDNA

The synthesis of cDNA was performed using 20 μg of total RNA and the SuperScript® III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, Netherlands), as described in Shafeeq et al. (2015) [6]. After the cDNA was synthesized, the mRNA of the reverse transcription mixture was denaturalized by adding 3 μl of 2.5 mM NaOH for 15 min at 37 °C. The NaOH was neutralized by adding 15 μl of 2 M HEPES free acid. The cDNA was purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nager, Landsmeer, The Netherlands). Briefly, 200 μl of NTC buffer was mixed with the unpurified cDNA, added to a column and centrifuged for 1 min at 11,000 × g. The column was washed first with 600 μl of buffer NT3 and then with 500 μl 80% ethanol. The residual ethanol was completely removed by centrifugation for 2 min at 11,000 × g. To elute the cDNA, 60 μl of 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate pH 9.0 was added to the column and incubated for 1 min at room temperature. Purified cDNA was collected by centrifugation for 1 min at 11,000 × g and was immediately labeled.

Labeling of cDNA

DyLight 550 NHS ester and DyLight 650 NHS ester (Thermo Scientific) were used to label the cDNAs. Dyes were dissolved in 200 μl of DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) (Sigma-Aldrich). 60 μl of purified cDNA (in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate pH 9.0, see above) labeled with 5 μl DyLight 550 or DyLight 650 in the dark for 90 min at room temperature. Labeled cDNA was purified using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up columns as described in the previous section, with the exception that cDNA was eluted with 50 μl of elution buffer NE of the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit.

Hybridization and washing

Nine hundred nanograms of DyLight 550- and DyLight 650-labeled cDNA was mixed and hybridized for 17 h at 60 °C in the L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 DNA microarray using the In situ Hybridization Kit Plus, the Hybridization Gasket Slide and the Agilent G2534A Microarray Hybridization Chamber (Agilent Technologies). After hybridization, slides were washed using appropriate washing buffers as recommended by the manufacturer.

Microarray data analysis

Slides were scanned using a GenePix 4200A Microarray Scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and the images analyzed using GenePix Pro v.6.0 software. Background subtraction and LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing) normalization were performed using the standard routines provided by GENOME2D software available at http://server.molgenrug.nl/index.php/analysis-pipeline. DNA microarray data were obtained from three independent biological replicates and two technical replicates (including a dye swap). Expression ratios were calculated from the comparison of four spots per gene per microarray (a total of 20 measurements per gene). A gene was considered differentially expressed when a p value of at least < 0.05 was obtained and the expression fold-change was at least >|0.5 |. The microarray data were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession no. GSE59514.

Discussion

In this study, we determined the effect of aguR deletion on the transcriptomic profile of L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 grown in M17 supplemented with 1% galactose and 20 mM agmatine. The genes aguB, aguD, aguA and aguC coding for the proteins needed for the biosynthesis of putrescine through the AGDI pathway are highly downregulated in the ∆aguR mutant strain, indicating the role of AguR as transcriptional activator of the catalytic AGDI genes that results essential for putrescine biosynthesis [2]. The microarray analysis also reveals the low expression of aguR in the CECT 8666 wild-type strain. In addition, other 49 genes were downregulated and 41 upregulated in the ∆aguR mutant strain compared to the CECT 8666 wild-type strain. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of AguR in the regulation of these genes.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueL. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 (formerly GE2-14)
SexN/A
Sequencer or array typeOligo-based DNA microarray
Data formatRaw and normalized
Experimental factorsL. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 ∆aguR (test) versus L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 (reference)
Experimental featuresMicroarray comparison was preformed to identify genes differentially expressed in L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 ΔaguR compared to L. lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 grown in M17 medium supplemented with 1% galactose (w/v) and 20 mM agmatine.
ConsentN/A
Sample source locationVillaviciosa, Spain
  6 in total

1.  Sequencing and transcriptional analysis of the biosynthesis gene cluster of putrescine-producing Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Victor Ladero; Fergal P Rattray; Baltasar Mayo; María Cruz Martín; María Fernández; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  AguR, a Transmembrane Transcription Activator of the Putrescine Biosynthesis Operon in Lactococcus lactis, Acts in Response to the Agmatine Concentration.

Authors:  Daniel M Linares; Beatriz Del Rio; Begoña Redruello; Victor Ladero; M Cruz Martin; Anne de Jong; Oscar P Kuipers; Maria Fernandez; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Lactose-mediated carbon catabolite repression of putrescine production in dairy Lactococcus lactis is strain dependent.

Authors:  Beatriz del Rio; Victor Ladero; Begoña Redruello; Daniel M Linares; Maria Fernández; Maria Cruz Martín; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  The putrescine biosynthesis pathway in Lactococcus lactis is transcriptionally regulated by carbon catabolic repression, mediated by CcpA.

Authors:  Daniel M Linares; Beatriz del Río; Victor Ladero; Begoña Redruello; María Cruz Martín; María Fernández; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Transcriptional profiling of UlaR-regulated genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Sulman Shafeeq; Muhammad Afzal; Birgitta Henriques-Normark; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-03-07

6.  Genome Sequence Analysis of the Biogenic Amine-Producing Strain Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 (Formerly GE2-14).

Authors:  Victor Ladero; Beatriz Del Rio; Daniel M Linares; Maria Fernandez; Baltasar Mayo; M Cruz Martin; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-10-23
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Transcriptome profiling of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris CECT 8666 in response to agmatine.

Authors:  Beatriz Del Rio; Begoña Redruello; M Cruz Martin; Maria Fernandez; Anne de Jong; Oscar P Kuipers; Victor Ladero; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-12-17

2.  Transcriptome profiling of TDC cluster deletion mutant of Enterococcus faecalis V583.

Authors:  Marta Perez; Victor Ladero; Beatriz Del Rio; Begoña Redruello; Anne de Jong; Oscar P Kuipers; Jan Kok; M Cruz Martin; Maria Fernandez; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2016-06-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.