Literature DB >> 2669727

Ventricular pressure-volume relations as the primary basis for evaluation of cardiac mechanics. Return to Frank's diagram.

R Jacob1, G Kissling.   

Abstract

Considering ventricular function from the vantage point of the pressure-volume (P-V) diagram permits not only quantification of ventricular working capacity under normal and pathophysiological conditions but also promotes understanding of cardiac dynamics including prediction of the effects of mechanical and pharmacological interventions. Therefore it seems appropriate, at least intellectually, to classify all measured volume and pressure data into the scheme of the P-V diagram. The use of so-called contractility indices and also the restriction to the end-systolic P-V relation alone means deliberate renunciation of important information. In principle, Frank's original concept can be confirmed which, under afterloaded conditions, implies the existence of distinct end-systolic P-V curves each related to a particular end-diastolic volume. As an approximation, however, the assumption of one common end-systolic P-V relation seems tolerable. Based on Frank's diagram, a concept for assessment of ventricular and myocardial function is presented following a discussion of the determinants of the diastolic and end-systolic P-V relations, as well as the methodological difficulties and different notions with regard to the end-systolic P-V curve. The P-V area between the curves of systolic maxima and diastolic minima, up to a defined end-diastolic pressure, is recommended as a measure for quantitative evaluation of ventricular working capacity. Transformation into stress-length (sigma-l) relations is indispensable for assessment of myocardial function under the conditions of changed ventricular geometry. The normalized sigma-l area yields a measure for interindividual evaluation of myocardial working capacity. This concept of evaluation does not mean acknowledgement of the visco-elastic theory of muscle contraction nor of the Emax concept. The P-V and sigma-l relations must, however, be complemented by time related parameters in order to estimate ventricular and myocardial power capacity. After a long-lasting search through international literature for "contractility indices" of general applicability and significance it seems appropriate to return to Frank's diagram as the primary basis for evaluating cardiac mechanics.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2669727     DOI: 10.1007/bf01907971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8428            Impact factor:   17.165


  78 in total

1.  [Pressure volume diagram of heart of cold-blooded animals; significance of plastic elements for heart mechanism].

Authors:  H GEHL; K GRAF; K KRAMER
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1955

2.  Pressure-volume relations, elastic modulus, and contractile behaviour of the hypertrophied left ventricle of rats with Goldblatt II hypertension.

Authors:  G Kissling; T Gassenmaier; M F Wendt-Gallitelli; R Jacob
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1977-07-19       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Chronic cardiac reactions. I. Assessment of ventricular and myocardial work capacity in the hypertrophied and dilated ventricle.

Authors:  R Jacob; M Vogt; K Noma
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.165

4.  [Factors limiting increase of stroke volume by positive inotropism. Studies on sufficient hearts under continous postextrasystolic potentiation].

Authors:  G Kissling; R Jacob
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Left ventricular isovolumetric pressure-volume relations, "diastolic tone", and contractility in the rat heart after physical training.

Authors:  A Hepp; M Hansis; R Gülch; R Jacob
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1974 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  [Critical remarks on the significance of "contractility indices"].

Authors:  R Jacob; R Gülch
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Kreislaufforsch       Date:  1972

7.  Volume-tension diagrams of ejecting and isovolumic contractions in left ventricle.

Authors:  R R Taylor; J W Covell; J Ross
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1969-05

8.  [End-diastolic distensibility of the left ventricle in situ in acute changes of arterial systemic pressure].

Authors:  E Bauereisen; R Jacob; U Kleinheisterkamp; U Peiper; K H Weigand
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1965-09-15

9.  [Force-velocity relation during the isovolumetric phase of left ventricular systole in the dog (whole animal)].

Authors:  H P Krayenbühl
Journal:  Helv Physiol Pharmacol Acta       Date:  1967

10.  Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations.

Authors:  W Grossman; E Braunwald; T Mann; L P McLaurin; L H Green
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

1.  The initial tangent of the aortic pressure increase is an estimate of left ventricular contractility in pigs.

Authors:  Hille Kisch-Wedel; Gregor Kemming; Franz Meisner; Michael Flondor; Sebastian Bruhn; Carolina Koehler; Bernhard Zwissler
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Geometric and muscle physiological factors of the Frank-Starling mechanisms.

Authors:  R Jacob; B Dierberger; R W Gülch; G Kissling
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  The prostaglandins epoprostenol and iloprost increase left ventricular contractility in vivo.

Authors:  Hille Kisch-Wedel; Gregor Kemming; Franz Meisner; Michael Flondor; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Sebastian Bruhn; Carolina Koehler; Bernhard Zwissler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Monitoring of cardiovascular physiology augmented by a patient-specific biomechanical model during general anesthesia. A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Arthur Le Gall; Fabrice Vallée; Kuberan Pushparajah; Tarique Hussain; Alexandre Mebazaa; Dominique Chapelle; Étienne Gayat; Radomír Chabiniok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.