| Literature DB >> 26697107 |
Alessandro Galia1, Benedetto Schiavo1, Claudia Antonetti2, Anna Maria Raspolli Galletti2, Leonardo Interrante1, Marco Lessi2, Onofrio Scialdone1, Maria Grazia Valenti1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autohydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass in liquid hot water has been widely studied owing to its high efficiency and relatively low cost. In the perspective of industrial applications, continuous or semi-continuous processes are more interesting than batch systems. Moreover, microwave heating of pretreatment systems has been proposed to intensify the kinetics of the process. In this study, the autohydrolysis of Arundo donax was performed in pure liquid hot water using a microwave-heated batch reactor and a semi-continuous flow-through reaction system with fast heating rate at the same operating conditions with the aim of performing a systematic comparison between the two different experimental apparatuses.Entities:
Keywords: Autohydrolysis; Flow-through system; Lignocellulosic biomass; Liquid hot water; Microwaves; Pretreatment
Year: 2015 PMID: 26697107 PMCID: PMC4687390 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0398-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Comparison between microwave-assisted batch and fast heating rate flow-through reaction systems: effect of operative temperature on the product concentrations in the liquid hydrolysate
| Reaction conditions | Monomer conc. | Oligomer/polymer conc. | Degradation product conc. | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. | T ( °C) | t (min) | τ (min) | Q (mL/min) | Mb/Vw (g/L) | Log(KSFS) | Log(KSFL) | Glu (g/L) | Xyl (g/L) | Arab (g/L) | ASL (g/L) | Olig (Cell) (g/L) | Olig(Hemi) (g/L) | Acet (g/L) | Lev (g/L) | HMF (g/L) | F (g/L) | FA (g/L) |
| 1FT | 180 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 3.66 | 2.99 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 7.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| 2FT | 200 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 4.25 | 3.58 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 9.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 1MW | 180 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 3.66 | 3.66 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | <0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
τ average residence time, Q water flow rate, M /V biomass to water ratio (w/vol), KSF kinetic severity factor for the solid phase, KSF kinetic severity factor for the liquid phase, Glu glucose, Xyl xylose, Arab arabinose, ASL acid-soluble lignin, Cell cellulose, Hemi hemicellulose, Acet acetic acid, Lev levulinic acid, HMF hydroxymethylfurfural, F furfural, FA formic acid
Comparison between microwave-assisted batch and fast heating rate flow-through reaction systems: effect of operative temperature on the product yields (% w/w)
| Reaction conditions | Xtot (%) | Monomer yield | Oligomer/polymer yield | Degradation product yield | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. | T (°C) | t (min) | τ (min) | Q (mL/min) | Mb/Vw (g/L) | Log (KSFS) | Log (KSFL) | YGlu (%) | YXyl (%) | YArab (%) | YASL (%) | Yolig(Cell) (%) | Yolig(Hemi) (%) | YAcet (%) | YLev (%) | YHMF (%) | YF (%) | YFA (%) | |
| 1FT | 180 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 3.66 | 2.99 | 28.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 15.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| 2FT | 200 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 4.25 | 3.58 | 40.3 | 0.4 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 24.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 1MW | 180 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 3.66 | 3.66 | 29.0 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 34.0 | 1.8 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
τ average residence time, Q water flow rate, M /V biomass to water ratio (w/vol), KSF kinetic severity factor for the solid phase, KSF kinetic severity factor for the liquid phase, X total solubilized fraction of the initial biomass calculated by Eq. 8, Glu glucose, Xyl xylose, Arab arabinose, ASL acid-soluble lignin, Cell cellulose, Hemi hemicellulose, Acet acetic acid, Lev levulinic acid, HMF hydroxymethilfurfural, F furfural, FA formic acid
Cellulose and hemicellulose extraction in experiments carried out at different reaction temperature
| Experiment | Cellulose extraction (% w/w) | Hemicellulose extraction (% w/w) | Extracted Cellulose/Hemicellulose |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1FT | 4 | 56 | 0.07 |
| 2FT | 6 | ~100 | 0.06 |
| 1MW | 16 | 44 | 0.37 |
| 2MW | 16 | 55 | 0.30 |
For the calculations of the reported values, see the section “Methods”
Comparison between microwave-assisted batch and fast heating rate flow-through reaction systems: effect of processing time on the product concentrations
| Reaction conditions | Monomer conc. | Oligomer/polymer conc. | Degradation product conc. | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. | T (°C) | t (min) | τ (min) | Q (mL/min) | Mb/Vw (g/L) | Log (KSFS) | Log (KSFL) | Glu (g/L) | Xyl (g/L) | Arab (g/L) | ASL (g/L) | Olig (Cell) (g/L) | Olig (Hemi) (g/L) | Acet (g/L) | Lev (g/L) | HMF (g/L) | F (g/L) | FA (g/L) |
| 2FT | 200 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 4.25 | 3.58 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 9.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 3FT | 200 | 40 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 50 | 4.55 | 3.88 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 4FT | 200 | 20 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 100 | 4.25 | 3.88 | 0.5 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 2MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | <0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 3MW | 200 | 40 | – | – | 50 | 4.55 | 4.55 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 4MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 100 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 1.5 | 8.8 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
τ average residence time, Q water flow rate, M /V biomass to water ratio (w/vol), KSF kinetic severity factor for the solid phase, KSF kinetic severity factor for the liquid phase, Glu glucose, Xyl xylose, Arab arabinose, ASL acid-soluble lignin, Cell cellulose, Hemi hemicellulose, Acet acetic acid, Lev levulinic acid, HMF hydroxymethilfurfural, F furfural, FA formic acid
Comparison between microwave-assisted batch and fast heating rate flow-through reaction systems: effect of processing time on the product yields (%w/w)
| Reaction conditions | Xtot (%) | Monomer yield | Oligomer/polymer yield | Degradation product yield | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. | T (°C) | t (min) | τ (min) | Q (mL/min) | Mb/Vw (g/L) | Log (KSFS) | Log (KSFL) | YGlu (%) | YXyl (%) | YArab (%) | YASL (%) | Yolig(Cell) (%) | Yolig(Hemi) (%) | YAcet (%) | YLev (%) | YHMF (%) | YF (%) | YFA (%) | |
| 2FT | 200 | 20 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 50 | 4.25 | 3.58 | 40.3 | 0.4 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 24.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 3FT | 200 | 40 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 50 | 4.55 | 3.88 | 44.5 | 2.7 | 9.5 | 0.9 | 6.5 | 3.4 | 9.4 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
| 4FT | 200 | 20 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 100 | 4.25 | 3.88 | 34.1 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 16.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| 2MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 50 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 34.0 | 1.8 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | <0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 3MW | 200 | 40 | – | – | 50 | 4.55 | 4.55 | 35.0 | 3.9 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.0 |
| 4MW | 200 | 20 | – | – | 100 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 30.0 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
τ average residence time, Q water flow rate, M /V biomass to water ratio (w/vol), KSF kinetic severity factor for the solid phase, KSF kinetic severity factor for the liquid phase, X total solubilized fraction of the initial biomass calculated by Eq. 8, Glu glucose, Xyl xylose, Arab arabinose, ASL acid-soluble lignin, Cell cellulose, Hemi hemicellulose, Acet acetic acid, Lev levulinic acid, HMF hydroxymethilfurfural, F furfural, FA formic acid
Cellulose and hemicellulose extraction in the experiments carried out at different reaction time
| Experiment | Cellulose extraction (%) | Hemicellulose extraction (%) | Cellulose/hemicellulose extracted |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2FT | 6 | ~100 | 0.06 |
| 3FT | 19 | 88 | 0.21 |
| 4FT | 5 | 90 | 0.06 |
| 2MW | 16 | 55 | 0.30 |
| 3MW | 34 | 28 | 1.19 |
| 4MW | 17 | 38 | 0.45 |
For the calculations of the reported values, see the section "Methods"
Fig. 1FTIR spectra of cellulose (microcrystalline powder, 99.0 % purity), hemicellulose (xylan from birchwood, 90 % purity) and Kraft lignin (alkali, low sulfonate content) powders used as reference compounds for the main constituents of Arundo donax
Fig. 2FTIR spectra of the solid residues after the pretreatment of Arundo donax in the MW-assisted batch reactor at two different temperatures; the spectrum of the Arundo donax before the pretreatment is also reported for comparison
Fig. 3FTIR spectra of the solid residues after the pretreatment of Arundo donax in the flow-through system at two different temperatures; the spectrum of the Arundo donax before the pretreatment is also reported for comparison
Raw material composition of adopted Arundo donax
| Component | Dry matter (% w/w) | Biopolymers (% w/w) |
|---|---|---|
| Glucan | 36.3 ± 3.0 | Cellulose |
| Xylan | 28.2 ± 2.0 | Hemicellulose |
| Arabinan | 1.8 ± 0.1 | |
| Klason lignin | 26.3 ± 1.8 | Lignin |
| Acid-soluble lignin | 2.2 ± 0.2 | |
| Ash | 2.4 ± 0.1 | – |
Fig. 4Schematic description of the assembled flow-through apparatus for LHW experiments