Won-Gyu Yoo1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] We developed a double air-cushion biofeedback device to be used for sacroiliac (SI) joint exercises and investigated the effects of exercising using the device in a patient with SI joint pain. [Subject] A 40-year-old man, who complained of pain in the left posterior iliac crest area and SI joints over a 6-month period participated. [Methods] After a 4-week exercise program using the double air-cushion biofeedback device, the subject was assessed using the Gaenslen, Patrick, posterior shear (POSH), and resisted abduction (REAB) tests. [Results] After performing exercise designed to strengthen subdivisions of the gluteus medius, the subject had no pain in the Gaenslen, Patrick, POSH, or REAB tests of the SI joint. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain on palpation of the left posterior iliac crest area decreased to 4/10 from an initial score of 7/10. [Conclusion] Exercises with the double air-cushion biofeedback device improved hip asymmetry, SI joint mobility, and muscle strength.
[Purpose] We developed a double air-cushion biofeedback device to be used for sacroiliac (SI) joint exercises and investigated the effects of exercising using the device in a patient with SI joint pain. [Subject] A 40-year-old man, who complained of pain in the left posterior iliac crest area and SI joints over a 6-month period participated. [Methods] After a 4-week exercise program using the double air-cushion biofeedback device, the subject was assessed using the Gaenslen, Patrick, posterior shear (POSH), and resisted abduction (REAB) tests. [Results] After performing exercise designed to strengthen subdivisions of the gluteus medius, the subject had no pain in the Gaenslen, Patrick, POSH, or REAB tests of the SI joint. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain on palpation of the left posterior iliac crest area decreased to 4/10 from an initial score of 7/10. [Conclusion] Exercises with the double air-cushion biofeedback device improved hip asymmetry, SI joint mobility, and muscle strength.
The bone in the sacroiliac (SI) joints is covered with a cartilage layer that allows some
movement and acts as a shock absorber1, 2). When this cartilage is damaged or worn
away, the bones begin to rub on each other, leading to arthritis. This is the most common
cause of SI joint dysfunction1,2,3). Degenerative
arthritis is common in the SI and other weight-bearing joints. SI joint pain occurs when
leaning forward to perform lifting, bending, or lowering motions, moving the line of gravity
anterior toward the acetabular axis2). SI
joint pain suggests that nociceptive and painful mechanical stress within the SI joint or
acting on the surrounding tissues attached to the innominate bones is caused by pelvic
asymmetry or SI joint instability3). SI
joint dysfunction is common in athletes and the general population because the SI joint
links the spine and lower extremities, and high loads are transferred through the lumbar
spine and pelvis during athletic activity3). In this study, we developed a double air-cushion biofeedback device
for SI joint exercises, and investigated the effects of exercising using the device in a
patient with SI joint pain.
SUBJECT AND METHODS
A 40-year-old man who complained of pain in the left posterior iliac crest area and SI
joints over a 6-month period participated. The study purpose and methods were explained to
the subject, who provided informed consent according to the principles of the Declaration of
Helsinki before participating. When bending his waist, he felt SI joint pain. Severe pain
also occurred in the left posterior iliac crest area and SI joints after standing for 1 hour
or after walking for 30 min. We developed a double air-cushion biofeedback device for SI
joint exercises. The device consisted of two 20 × 10 cm air cushions containing
pressure-detecting sensors (AP-series pressure sensors, Keyence, Japan). The subject was
provided visual feedback using displays linked to the pressure sensors. The two air cushions
were positioned between the left and right hip joints and a seat support. The air cushion
positions on the support board could be adjusted with Velcro. The pressure sensors could
sense the air pressure within the air cushion. Exercise 1 involved maintaining the same air
pressure on both sides while in a sitting posture during a leg-raising exercise with knee
flexion at 90° and an erect sitting posture using the device. A therapist instructed the
subject and defined success and failure at maintaining the air pressure balance on both
sides. The subject performed the exercise successfully 30 times each for the left and right
leg-raising exercises in the sitting position. Exercise 2 involved lateral pelvic rotation.
The subject performed on one side and the opposite side was lifted; this depressing double
air-cushion biofeedback device on one side. The therapist instructed the subject to maintain
the air pressure on the depressed side at twice the value for the lifted side. Again, the
therapist instructed and defined success and failure at maintaining the appropriate air
pressures on both sides. The subject performed the exercise successfully 30 times each for
the left and right sides. All exercises consisted of three sets of 15 repetitions per day
over 4 weeks.The subject was assessed before and after the 4-week exercise program using a visual analog
scale (VAS), with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst imaginable pain and
with the posterior shear (POSH), and resisted abduction (REAB) tests.
RESULTS
Before the 4-week exercise program with the double air-cushion biofeedback device,
pain-provocation tests reproduced the pain at both SI joints. For the right SI joint, the
Gaenslen, Patrick, and REAB tests gave positive results. For the left SI joint, he
experienced pain with the Gaenslen, Patrick, and REAB tests. The patient rated his response
to palpation of the left posterior iliac crest area in the prone position as 7/10 on a
VAS.After the 4-week exercise program, the subject showed no SI joint pain in the Gaenslen,
Patrick, POSH, or REAB tests. The VAS score was less the 4/10 on palpation of the left
posterior iliac crest area, compared with an initial score of 7/10.
DISCUSSION
This study investigated the effects of a double air-cushion biofeedback device used during
exercises for a patient with SI joint pain. After exercising for 4 weeks, the subject showed
no pain in pain-provocation tests of the SI joint (the Gaenslen, Patrick, POSH, or REAB
tests), and his VAS score decreased from 7/10 to 4/10.The stability of the SI joint is increased by nutation torque, which is produced by three
factors: hip joint compression due to body weight (i.e., by gravity); passive tension of
stretched ligaments; and active muscle force4). Exercises 1 and 2, conducted in a sitting position, would produce
hip joint compression from body weight (gravity) because the ischial tuberosity is fixed on
the seat support. The double air-cushion biofeedback device should improve the passive
tension of stretched ligaments and active muscle forces. Biofeedback is an effective
intervention for re-educating patients on posture and reducing the altered activation of
muscles5). SI joint dysfunction is a
pathological release of the self-bracing position with anterior pelvic rotation2). A shortened hamstring muscle pulls the
ischial tuberosity inferiorly during forward bending, reducing the anterior tilt of the
pelvis6). Yoo showed that exercises
designed to strengthen the gluteus medius were effective at reducing SI joint pain7). There is a relationship between the SI
joint and limited hip mobility8). Patients
with SI joint dysfunction also have asymmetric hip mobility with reduced abduction and
lateral rotation8). Exercises 1 and 2 with
the device should improve hip asymmetry, SI joint mobility, and muscle strength.