Yong-Han Paik1,2. 1. Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Liver cirrhosis results from chronic liver injuries that cause the accumulation of extracellular matrix and progression of hepatic fibrosis.1 The patients with liver cirrhosis may develop decompensation such as ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy leading to death, in addition, patients having cirrhosis have a high risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. With the advent of potent oral antivirals against hepatitis B or C virus, even decompensated liver cirrhosis can be improved to the compensated cirrhosis. However, until now there was no direct antifibrotic therapy approved to treat hepatic fibrosis.Hepatic fibrogenesis is a dynamic process and hepatic stellate cell (HSC) is a main fibrogenic cell type in the development of hepatic fibrosis.1 Various liver injuries from alcohol, hepatitis virus, and toxic bile acids, and so forth, activate and transform quiescent HSCs into activated HSCs. Activated HSCs proliferate, migrate, secrete inflammatory cytokines and produce type I collagen. HSCs mediate fibrogenic signaling pathways interacting with other cell types including hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, sinusoid endothelial cells, and infiltrating immune cells. The dynamic interactions between HSCs and various immune cells and other resident liver cells may result in the progression or regression of hepatic fibrosis. Activation of HSCs is promoted by interactions with hepatocytes, macrophages, innate lymphoid cells, B cells, natural killer T cells, and sinusoid endothelial cells.Due to increasing understanding the molecular mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis, multiple candidates of antifibrotic therapeutics have been emerging.2 One useful strategy may be adopting agents that are approved for the treatment of other disease. This strategy can give us the advantage that safety of the drug and drug to drug interactions has been well characterized. In this regard, candesartan, an antihypertensive medicine blocking angiotensin II type I receptor, induced an improvement of hepatic fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease.3 Muñoz-Ortega et al.4 in this issue of Gut and Liver explored the ant fibrotic effect of adrenergic receptor antagonist, doxazosin and carvedilol, that were commonly used as antihypertensive medicine, in rodent models of hepatic fibrosis. They found a decrease in type I collagen deposition and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-secreting cells in the hamster liver after co-administration with doxazosin and carvedilol in CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis.Doxazocin is a α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist and carvedilol is nonselective β-blocker with α1-adrenergic blocking activity that is used as antihypertensive drugs. Carvedilol is effective in reducing portal pressure and is used for primary and secondary prophylaxis in patients with high-risk esophageal varices. It was reported that HSCs express functional adrenoreceptor, and sympathetic nervous system neurotransmitters induce activation of HSCs.5,6 Activated HSCs in culture express α1A, β1, β2 and, β3 adrenoreceptors. HSCs synthesize and release the catecholamine to regulate HSCs basal growth, and prazosin or propranolol reduces HSCs basal growth.7 In addition, norepinephrine stimulates calcium spike and secretion of inflammatory chemokines such as regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted and interleukin-8 in HSCs.6 Norepinephrine and epinephrine stimulates HSCs through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Moreover, norepinephrine induces TGF-β expression and type I collagen gene expression in HSCs.7 Taken together, adrenergic antagonists may be a candidate as a novel therapeutic for hepatic fibrosis.However, caution is required when using antiadrenergic agents in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Many drugs are metabolized in the liver by enzymatic conversion into active, inactive or even toxic metabolites. The influence of liver disease status have on hepatic metabolism can be highly variable and unpredictable.8 Carvedilol and prazosin are metabolized by the liver, and it is recommended that these drugs not be administered to patients with clinically manifested hepatic impairment. The newer-generation of β-blockers such as carvedilol has a potent portal hypotensive effect that is superior to propranolol; however, it has greater risk to cause systemic hypotension.9 There has been debate regarding the safety and efficacy of nonselective β-blocker in patients with advanced cirrhosis with ascites. It was reported that use of nonselective β-blocker increase risks for hepatorenal syndrome and acute kidney injury reducing transplant-free survival in cirrhoticpatients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.10 However, recent study reported that nonselective β-blocker are safe and associated with less waitlist death in patients with ascites complicating end-stage liver disease.11 Because antifibrotic therapy usually takes long duration of treatment, safety as well as efficacy is very important. Although in vitro and in vivo animal studies demonstrated the antifibrotic effect of adrenergic antagonist, the optimal dosing in cirrhoticpatients should be further studied for the clinical trials in human.
Authors: Moon Young Kim; Mee Yon Cho; Soon Koo Baik; Phil Ho Jeong; Ki Tae Suk; Yoon Ok Jang; Chang Jin Yea; Jae Woo Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Sang Ok Kwon; Byung Su Yoo; Jang Young Kim; Min Seob Eom; Seung Hwan Cha; Sei Jin Chang Journal: Liver Int Date: 2012-02-26 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Mattias Mandorfer; Simona Bota; Philipp Schwabl; Theresa Bucsics; Nikolaus Pfisterer; Matthias Kruzik; Michael Hagmann; Alexander Blacky; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Wolfgang Sieghart; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Reiberger Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Yong-Han Paik; Jonghwa Kim; Tomonori Aoyama; Samuele De Minicis; Ramon Bataller; David A Brenner Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Rafael Bañares; Eduardo Moitinho; Ana Matilla; Juan Carlos García-Pagán; José Luis Lampreave; Carlos Piera; Juan G Abraldes; Alejandro De Diego; Agustín Albillos; Jaime Bosch Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: J A Oben; T Roskams; S Yang; H Lin; N Sinelli; M Torbenson; U Smedh; T H Moran; Z Li; J Huang; S A Thomas; A M Diehl Journal: Gut Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Joanna A Leithead; Neil Rajoriya; Nadeem Tehami; James Hodson; Bridget K Gunson; Dhiraj Tripathi; James W Ferguson Journal: Gut Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Martin Humberto Muñoz-Ortega; Raúl Wiliberto Llamas-Ramírez; Norma Isabel Romero-Delgadillo; Tania Guadalupe Elías-Flores; Edgar de Jesus Tavares-Rodríguez; María Del Rosario Campos-Esparza; Daniel Cervantes-García; Luis Muñoz-Fernández; Martin Gerardo-Rodríguez; Javier Ventura-Juárez Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.519