Literature DB >> 26695816

Managing the Budget: Stock-Flow Reasoning and the CO2 Accumulation Problem.

Ben R Newell1, Arthur Kary1, Chris Moore1, Cleotilde Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

The majority of people show persistent poor performance in reasoning about "stock-flow problems" in the laboratory. An important example is the failure to understand the relationship between the "stock" of CO2 in the atmosphere, the "inflow" via anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and the "outflow" via natural CO2 absorption. This study addresses potential causes of reasoning failures in the CO2 accumulation problem and reports two experiments involving a simple re-framing of the task as managing an analogous financial (rather than CO2 ) budget. In Experiment 1 a financial version of the task that required participants to think in terms of controlling debt demonstrated significant improvements compared to a standard CO2 accumulation problem. Experiment 2, in which participants were invited to think about managing savings, suggested that this improvement was fortuitous and coincidental rather than due to a fundamental change in understanding the stock-flow relationships. The role of graphical information in aiding or abetting stock-flow reasoning was also explored in both experiments, with the results suggesting that graphs do not always assist understanding. The potential for leveraging the kind of reasoning exhibited in such tasks in an effort to change people's willingness to reduce CO2 emissions is briefly discussed.
Copyright © 2015 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 accumulation; Climate change; Correlation heuristic; Stock-flow reasoning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26695816     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  2 in total

1.  Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Peter J Rayner; Daniel B Shank; Sophie Guy; Simon D Lilburn; Saam Saber; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  When A+B < A: Cognitive Bias in Experts' Judgment of Environmental Impact.

Authors:  Mattias Holmgren; Alan Kabanshi; John E Marsh; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.