Literature DB >> 2669574

Ultrasonographic and biometric evaluation of the eye and orbit of dogs.

N B Cottrill1, W J Banks, R D Pechman.   

Abstract

The normal B-scan ultrasonographic anatomic features of the eye and orbit of mesocephalic and dolichocephalic dogs were described. The B-scan appearance of ocular and orbital structures correlated well with the visual morphologic features of the specimens. The eyes of mesocephalic and dolichocephalic dogs were measured by use of ultrasonographic methods; those measurements were compared with direct measurements of the specimens. The 2-tailed Student t-test was used for all statistical analyses (P = 0.05). Measurements made included mid-cornea to anterior lens surface, lens thickness, vitreous body (posterior lens surface to retina), and axial globe length. The A-scan measurements of all 4 ocular distances were significantly different, compared with direct measurements. The B-scan measurements of mid-cornea to anterior lens surface, lens thickness, and vitreous body were significantly different from direct measurements; however, there was no significant difference between B-scan and direct measurements of axial globe length. There was no significant difference between A- and B-scan measurements. These findings suggest that A- and B-scan measurements are similar and that B-scan measurements are reasonably accurate for axial globe determination. Several variables were compared by B-scan and direct measurement methods. The axial globe length of dolichocephalic dogs was significantly longer than that of mesocephalic dogs. The axial globe length of male and female dogs was not significantly different in mesocephalic or dolichocephalic dogs. There was no significant difference in the axial globe length of right and left eyes in mesocephalic or dolichocephalic dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2669574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  6 in total

1.  Biological variability and measurement error variability in ocular biometry in samoyed dogs.

Authors:  B Ekesten
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Phenotypic characterization of complete CSNB in the inbred research beagle: how common is CSNB in research and companion dogs?

Authors:  Annie Oh; Ellis R Loew; Melanie L Foster; Michael G Davidson; Robert V English; Kristen J Gervais; Ian P Herring; Freya M Mowat
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The eye of the Barbary sheep or aoudad (Ammotragus lervia): reference values for selected ophthalmic diagnostic tests, morphologic and biometric observations.

Authors:  G A Fornazari; F Montiani-Ferreira; I R de Barros Filho; A T Somma; B Moore
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Normal reference ranges of ocular physiology and sonographic biometry of Latvian Hunting dogs.

Authors:  Līga Kovaļčuka; Gundega Mūrniece
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Comparison of computed tomographic ocular biometry in brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic cats.

Authors:  Kittiporn Yuwatanakorn; Chutimon Thanaboonnipat; Nalinee Tuntivanich; Damri Darawiroj; Nan Choisunirachon
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  Ultrasound, Dacryocystorhinography and Morphological Examination of Normal Eye and Lacrimal Apparatus of the Donkey (Equus asinus).

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelbaset-Ismail; Mohamed Aref; Shimaa Ezzeldein; Eslam Eisa; Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo; Ahmed Abdelaal; Hassan Emam; Khalid Al Syaad; Ahmed Ezzat Ahmed; Ali Alshati; Mustafa Abd El Raouf
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.