Literature DB >> 2669540

Inappropriate comparisons of incidence and prevalence in epidemiologic research.

W D Flanders1, T R O'Brien.   

Abstract

Several epidemiologists have published papers in major medical journals in which they compare incidence rates and prevalence and use these comparisons to support conclusions regarding questions of major public health importance. Although these papers have been criticized in published correspondence, we believe that continued use and advocacy of such comparisons by some epidemiologists has created the need for a full discussion of this practice. In this commentary, we review basic differences between incidence and prevalence and show that direct comparison of these two measures is inappropriate for conceptual, theoretical, and practical reasons.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2669540      PMCID: PMC1349710          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.9.1301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Definition of rates: some remarks on their use and misuse.

Authors:  R C Elandt-Johnson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The epidemiologic necropsy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Detection bias and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  F Merletti; P Cole
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Endometrial cancer and detection bias.

Authors:  B S Hulka; R C Grimson; B G Greenberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-10-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Maternal lead levels after alterations to water supply.

Authors:  M R Moore; A Goldberg; W M Fyfe; W N Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Necropsy diagnosis of endometrial cancer and detection-bias in case/control studies.

Authors:  R I Horwitz; A R Feinstein; S M Horwitz; S J Robboy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The 'epidemiologic necropsy'. Unexpected detections, demographic selections, and changing rates of lung cancer.

Authors:  M J McFarlane; A R Feinstein; C K Wells; C K Chan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Incidence, prevalence, and evidence. Scientific problems in epidemiologic statistics for the occurrence of cancer.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; J M Esdaile
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.965

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Letters on epidemiologic research methods.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Mathematical models and scientific reality in occurrence rates for disease.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; C K Chan; J M Esdaile; R I Horwitz; M J McFarlane; C K Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Monitoring Clostridium difficile infection in an acute hospital: prevalence or incidence studies?

Authors:  A H Lavan; D P McCartan; M M Downes; A D K Hill; F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  A science impact framework to measure impact beyond journal metrics.

Authors:  Mary D Ari; John Iskander; John Araujo; Christine Casey; John Kools; Bin Chen; Robert Swain; Miriam Kelly; Tanja Popovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.