Literature DB >> 26694928

Morphological study of the neurovascular bundle to elucidate nerve damage in pelvic surgery.

Mitsutaka Nishimura1, Yuji Nishizawa2, Munekazu Naito3, Shuichi Hirai4, Masahiro Itoh4, Masaaki Ito5, Shintaro Akamoto1, Yasuyuki Suzuki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Postoperative sexual and urinary dysfunction may occur after rectal cancer surgery involving the pelvis, but this problem cannot be solved. The aim of this study was to examine the nerve morphology of the neurovascular bundle in cadavers to determine possible causes of nerve damage during surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-two formalin-fixed cadavers were used in the study. The cadavers were donated to the Tokyo Medical University. The study comprised histological evaluation of paraffin-embedded bilateral neurovascular bundle specimens from the cadavers. Four slides of 3-cm thick were made every 1 cm in a plane perpendicular to the rectum towards the pelvic floor from the peritoneal reflection in bilateral neurovascular bundles in 22 cadavers. The number of nerves, the mean nerve area, and the mean nerve diameter were measured in each slide.
RESULTS: The results were categorized into cases with high (group H) and low (group L) positions of the pelvis 1 cm above and 2 cm below the peritoneal reflection, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of nerves between these groups. The nerve area and nerve diameter were significantly smaller in group L, and these characteristics were more marked in males.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the nerves of the neurovascular bundle became smaller in the deep pelvis. This may cause these nerves to be more susceptible to injury, resulting in nerve damage in the deep pelvis that leads to postoperative dysfunction. Particularly, this type of nerve damage may be a cause of postoperative sexual dysfunction in males.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Neurovascular bundle; Postoperative dysfunction; Rectal surgery; Sexual dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26694928     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2470-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  29 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Anatomical studies of the autonomic nervous system in the human pelvis by the whole-mount staining method: left-right communicating nerves between bilateral pelvic plexuses.

Authors:  K Taguchi; T Tsukamoto; G Murakami
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

4.  Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection and total mesorectal excision: prospective study on 52 patients.

Authors:  Peter Sterk; Bijan Shekarriz; Svetlana Günter; Jan Nolde; Robert Keller; Hans-Peter Bruch; Hodjat Shekarriz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Anatomic study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibres.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Wolf F Wieland; Johannes Bründl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Baseline erectile function alters the cavernous nerve quantity and distribution around the prostate.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Hisasue; Kohei Hashimoto; Ko Kobayashi; Motoi Takeuchi; Youki Kyoda; Shiori Sato; Naoya Masumori; Taiji Tsukamoto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Male sexual and urinary function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Umberto Parini; Marco Ettore Allaix; Gabriella Monasterolo; Riccardo Brachet Contul; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fascial space priority approach for the management of the lateral ligaments in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of the rectum.

Authors:  Y Sun; Z C Zhang; Y D Zhou; P Li; Q S Zeng; X P Zhang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.781

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.