BACKGROUND: No report has evaluated axitinib-induced proteinuria as a biomarker for predicting treatment efficacy and survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: The subjects were patients with mRCC treated with axitinib at Kinki University Hospital from February 2008 to November 2014. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed including baseline patient characteristics, time-dependent changes of urinary protein status, computed tomography scans of metastatic lesions, treatment duration with axitinib, and survival time. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were evaluable. Median tumor shrinkage rates were 32.3 and 35.0 % in patients with urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.496). Objective response rates were also similar between the two groups. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times with axitinib were 13.5 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.0-27.5] and 11.0 months (95 % CI 0.0-26.7) in patients with urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.975). The maximum tumor shrinkage rate with axitinib was significantly associated with PFS with axitinib as a result of multivariate analysis (p = 0.002). Median overall survival (OS) times were 39.8 months (95 % CI 12.7-67.0) and 25.4 months (95 % CI 11.2-39.6) in patients with axitinib-induced urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.250). The number of metastatic sites (p = 0.006), the MSKCC risk (p = 0.009), and the maximum tumor shrinkage rate with axitinib (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with OS as a result of multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of urinary protein increase during axitinib treatment was not associated with objective response, PFS, and OS in mRCC patients treated with axitinib.
BACKGROUND: No report has evaluated axitinib-induced proteinuria as a biomarker for predicting treatment efficacy and survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: The subjects were patients with mRCC treated with axitinib at Kinki University Hospital from February 2008 to November 2014. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed including baseline patient characteristics, time-dependent changes of urinary protein status, computed tomography scans of metastatic lesions, treatment duration with axitinib, and survival time. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were evaluable. Median tumor shrinkage rates were 32.3 and 35.0 % in patients with urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.496). Objective response rates were also similar between the two groups. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times with axitinib were 13.5 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.0-27.5] and 11.0 months (95 % CI 0.0-26.7) in patients with urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.975). The maximum tumor shrinkage rate with axitinib was significantly associated with PFS with axitinib as a result of multivariate analysis (p = 0.002). Median overall survival (OS) times were 39.8 months (95 % CI 12.7-67.0) and 25.4 months (95 % CI 11.2-39.6) in patients with axitinib-induced urinary protein increases ≥+2 and <+2, respectively (p = 0.250). The number of metastatic sites (p = 0.006), the MSKCC risk (p = 0.009), and the maximum tumor shrinkage rate with axitinib (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with OS as a result of multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of urinary protein increase during axitinib treatment was not associated with objective response, PFS, and OS in mRCC patients treated with axitinib.
Authors: Brian I Rini; Joan H Schiller; John P Fruehauf; Ezra E W Cohen; Jamal C Tarazi; Brad Rosbrook; Angel H Bair; Alejandro D Ricart; Anthony J Olszanski; Kristen J Letrent; Sinil Kim; Olivier Rixe Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Piotr Tomczak; Thomas E Hutson; M Dror Michaelson; Sylvie Negrier; Stephane Oudard; Martin E Gore; Jamal Tarazi; Subramanian Hariharan; Connie Chen; Brad Rosbrook; Sinil Kim; Brian I Rini Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Brian I Rini; Bohuslav Melichar; Takeshi Ueda; Viktor Grünwald; Mayer N Fishman; José A Arranz; Angel H Bair; Yazdi K Pithavala; Glen I Andrews; Dmitri Pavlov; Sinil Kim; Eric Jonasch Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Rakesh Kumar; Victoria B Knick; Sharon K Rudolph; Jennifer H Johnson; Renae M Crosby; Ming-Chih Crouthamel; Teresa M Hopper; Charles G Miller; Laura E Harrington; James A Onori; Robert J Mullin; Tona M Gilmer; Anne T Truesdale; Andrea H Epperly; Amogh Boloor; Jeffrey A Stafford; Deirdre K Luttrell; Mui Cheung Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312