David G Wilson1, Mehmood Zeb1, Gruschen Veldtman1, Borislav D Dimitrov2, John M Morgan1. 1. Cardiovascular Research Department, University Hospital Southampton and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom. 2. Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of a right parasternal sensing electrode position on the R- and T-wave amplitudes and the R:T ratio in three subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) vectors in patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) and normal controls. METHODS: Conventional left parasternal sensing electrode position and right parasternal sensing electrode positions were used to collect 10-second electrograms, recorded through an 80-electrode body surface mapping technology (Prime ECG™ system, Heartscape Technologies Inc., now Verathon, Columbia, MD, USA). Recordings were made in the supine, prone, left lateral, right lateral, sitting, and standing positions in using both the standard electrode vector position and the right parasternal positions. RESULTS: Forty patients were recruited and 37 patients were used for analysis. Twenty-seven (73%) had complex ACHD; 10 patients had normal hearts and acted as controls. A total of 3,708 data points were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the R:T ratio when measured in ACHD patients in the right compared to the left parasternal lead position. In contrast, there were important differences in the magnitude of the R:T ratio when measured in control patients in the right compared to the left parasternal lead position; in the primary vector, the R:T ratio was greater in right than left by 2.99 (P = 0.0002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-4.50) and in the secondary vector, the R:T ratio was smaller in the right than in the left by 0.77 (P = 0.004; 95% CI: -1.58-0.05). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, a right parasternal lead position may provide a useful alternative sensing configuration for the S-ICD.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of a right parasternal sensing electrode position on the R- and T-wave amplitudes and the R:T ratio in three subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) vectors in patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) and normal controls. METHODS: Conventional left parasternal sensing electrode position and right parasternal sensing electrode positions were used to collect 10-second electrograms, recorded through an 80-electrode body surface mapping technology (Prime ECG™ system, Heartscape Technologies Inc., now Verathon, Columbia, MD, USA). Recordings were made in the supine, prone, left lateral, right lateral, sitting, and standing positions in using both the standard electrode vector position and the right parasternal positions. RESULTS: Forty patients were recruited and 37 patients were used for analysis. Twenty-seven (73%) had complex ACHD; 10 patients had normal hearts and acted as controls. A total of 3,708 data points were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the R:T ratio when measured in ACHD patients in the right compared to the left parasternal lead position. In contrast, there were important differences in the magnitude of the R:T ratio when measured in control patients in the right compared to the left parasternal lead position; in the primary vector, the R:T ratio was greater in right than left by 2.99 (P = 0.0002; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-4.50) and in the secondary vector, the R:T ratio was smaller in the right than in the left by 0.77 (P = 0.004; 95% CI: -1.58-0.05). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, a right parasternal lead position may provide a useful alternative sensing configuration for the S-ICD.
Authors: Linda Wang; Neeraj Javadekar; Ananya Rajagopalan; Nichole M Rogovoy; Kazi T Haq; Craig S Broberg; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Pau Alonso; Joaquín Osca; Joaquín Rueda; Oscar Cano; Pedro Pimenta; Ana Andres; María José Sancho; Luis Martinez Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Vincent C Thomas; Mark Peterson; Martin McDaniel; Humberto Restrepo; Abraham Rothman; Amit Jain Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Paolo Ferrero; Hussam Ali; Palash Barman; Sara Foresti; Pierpaolo Lupo; Emilia D'Elia; Riccardo Cappato; Alan Graham Stuart Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2017-06-26